Mickey Mouse degrees

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mickey Mouse degrees is the dysphemism built from the common usage of the term "Micky Mouse" as a pejorative. (See Pejorative use of Mickey's name). It came to prominence in the UK after use by the national tabloids of Great Britain to label certain university degree courses worthless or irrelevant. The term was used by education minister Margaret Hodge, during a discussion on higher education expansion.^[1] Hodge defined a Mickey Mouse course as "one where the content is perhaps not as rigorous as one would expect and where the degree itself may not have huge relevance in the labour market" and "Simply stacking up numbers on Mickey Mouse courses is not acceptable" . This opinion is often raised in the summer when exam results are released and new university courses revealed. The phrase took off in the late 1990s, as the Labour government created the target of having 50% of students in higher education by 2010.^[2] This, along with a funding crisis, resulted in a major increase in degree course places, and at present there are more course places available than there are qualified students,^{[citation needed]} resulting in hundreds every year going to university despite poor A-level grades.

Media Studies has fallen victim to the term,^[3][4] since there are 43 times as many Media Studies students in higher education as there are jobs available in the media annually.^{[citation needed]} In 2000, Staffordshire University was mocked as providing 'David Beckham Studies' as it provided a module on the footballer as part of its Sports Science course.^[5] Other degrees deemed 'Mickey Mouse' include Golf Management, Surfing Studies, Wine Studies and Boxing.^[6] One thing these courses share is that they are vocational, which are seen to be less rigorous than the traditional academic degrees.^[6] Perception has not been helped in Great Britain by the conversion of Polytechnics to 'new' Universities.^[6] These 'new' universities then have trouble competing with the more established institutions instead of being judged as polytechnics.

Defenders of these courses object that the derogatory comments made in the media rely on the low symbolic capital of 'new' subjects, and rarely discuss course contents beyond the titles.^[1] Another factor is the correct or incorrect perception that the take up of these subjects, and the decline of more traditional academic subjects,^[7] is causing the predictable annual grade rise in Great Britain.

Although it is perceived as a recent phenomenon, 'dumbing down' has historical roots. In 1828, University College London was criticised for teaching the now prestigious English Literature.^[8]

The A-level in General Studies is seen as a Mickey Mouse subject,^[6] with many universities not accepting it as part of the requirements for an offer. The London School of Economics has a list of subjects on their website which they prefer students to not have chosen.^[9] Applicants with two or more of these (out of three altogether) will not normally be considered for a place.

An example found in the US are degrees in Physical education. These were derided when a slightly stupid character in NCIS special agent Anthony "Tony" DiNozzo announced that he had a degree in phys ed as he abbreviated.^{[citation needed]}

[edit] See also

• Media Studies for further information regarding derogatory attitudes
• Academic degree for a history of degrees given by universities
• Academia or Scholarly method for a discussion of the academic world and what makes a scholarly study.

[edit] References

[edit] External links

• Mickey Mouse would never sink so low...
• Tutors feel need to boost grades Excerpt from a BBC documentary about Higher Education Standards.