Talk:Mertens conjecture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Who did the search for counterexamples up to 10^14 and is the result published somewhere? (Akruppa)

There is an interesting discussion of the Mertens conjecture in Talk:Möbius_function. Perhaps some of that material could be moved here.


Cleanup:

Dates for S. are inconsistent. Also RH has not been proven false. This page is inaccurate.

  • the article does not claim that RH has been proven false. Read more carefully.
  • what exactly, precisely is inconsistent with S. dates ?

--FvdP 17:51, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Tag for context

I have tagged the article to be cleanup for context. Right now, it is very hard for readers without high level of math background to get a sense of what this is about. Perhaps give a 1 paragraph summary for the layman as introduction in the beginning of the article??

[edit] Is the first Sigma missing the upper bound of summation?

It just appears as though there is nothing there. Is this a mistake, or is there something that I'm not understanding about its context in the article? --Ķĩřβȳ♥ŤįɱéØ 07:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] No more a conjecture

A conjecture is an open question. And this one is closed. Not a conjecture. High time to create a new category. 83.199.53.61 22:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../m/e/r/Talk%7EMertens_conjecture_3b09.html"