Megatsunami

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Megatsunami (often hyphenated as mega-tsunami, also known as iminami or "wave of purification") is an informal term used mostly by popular media and popular scientific societies to describe a very large tsunami wave beyond the size reached by typical tsunamis (around 10 metres).[citation needed] A megatsunami is associated with waves beyond the norm for tsunamis, ranging from over 40 metres (131 feet) to giants over 100 metres (328 feet) tall. Note that the waves are often higher when they meet land, as the water often floods upwards from the force of impact.

Megatsunamis are caused by a very large impact or landslide into a body of water when the water cannot disperse in all directions.[citation needed] For this reason, they are usually a highly localized effect, either occurring when the origin of a tsunami is extremely close to the shore, or in deep, narrow inlets, lakes or other water passages.[citation needed]

Contents

[edit] General information

The astounding heights quoted for megatsunami waves are caused by the displacement of a very large volume of water in a limited space in a very short time creating a single powerful surge.

Megatsunamis may be caused by landslide and rockfall phenomena, explosive volcanic events, or meteor impacts. Underwater earthquakes do not normally generate such large tsunamis; typically tsunamis caused by earthquakes (such as the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake) have a height of less than ten metres at the shore (depending on how much water was displaced by the earthquake and on various natural factors such as tree cover and the general shore characteristics) but can affect thousands of kilometres of coastline and reach many kilometres inland.

[edit] Discovery and confirmation of existence

Megatsunamis were first hypothesized by geologists searching for oil in Alaska in 1953. They observed that mature forestation did not extend to the shoreline as it did in nearly all other bays in the region. Rather, there were bands of younger trees closer to the shore. The surveyors called the boundary between these bands a "trim line." Selected trees were cut in the areas just above and below each trim line. The trees just above these lines showed severe scarring, as if hit very hard from something that came from the coast. The only explanation scientists could think of was that there were unusually large waves in the nearby deep inlet called Lituya Bay, Alaska. This is an ice-scoured inlet 220 m deep with an entrance only 10 m wide. The topology of the inlet is particularly suited to producing local megatsunamis. They speculated that something had caused a huge wave, many hundreds of meters tall, in relatively recent times, but were unable to think how this might have happened.

On July 10, 1958 the speculation was confirmed, following a nearby earthquake of magnitude 7.7, which generated a landslide that sent water surging across Lituya Bay. It is estimated that the force of the landslide and consequent mass displacement put the height of the open water wave somewhere in excess of 300 m / 1000 feet [citation needed]. Howard Ulrich and his son, Howard Jr. were in the bay in their fishing boat when they saw the wave. Ulrich tried to get over the wave and he and his son miraculously survived the wave, and reported that it carried their boat "over the trees". Two other boats did not survive. The wave impacted the opposite side of the inlet, washing out trees 524 m / 1,720 ft above normal sea level. However, this quoted figure was not the height of the open water wave, but the height it tore up the mountainside due to its force of impact, stripping timber and soil down to the naked bedrock.

[edit] Known megatsunamis

[edit] Recent

In 1963, a man-made megatsunami occurred as a result of human destabilisation of a mountain valley. An enormous slab from the side of Monte Toc, in the mountains north of Venice, Italy, became destabilized as a result of reservoir filling, and slid into the Vajont Dam reservoir at 110 km/h, emptying 50% of the water within 10 minutes. This produced a surge-wave some 250 m (820 ft) high which destroyed several villages and killed about 2000 people. Remarkably, most of the dam survived, although it was rendered almost useless by the infill of the reservoir and structural damage to the I-beams and mechanisms of its interior.

On 18 May 1980 the upper 1500 ft (460 m) including the former summit of Mount St. Helens, a volcano in Washington, detached as a landslide. The avalanche slammed into Spirit Lake sending a tsunami surging around the lake basin as high as 250 m (820 ft) above lake level. Above the upper limit of the tsunami, trees lie where they were knocked down by a pyroclastic surge; below the limit, the downed trees and the surge deposits were removed by the tsunami and deposited in Spirit Lake.[1]

[edit] Historical

The geological record suggests that megatsunamis generated by the collapse of flank of a volcanic island, their most common cause, may occur every few thousand years [2]. Their size and power can produce devastating effects; travelling across oceans and reshaping entire coastlines. The most recent such event so far known occurred approximately 4,000 years ago on Réunion island, to the east of Madagascar. [3] However no megatsunamis have occurred in either the Atlantic Ocean or the Pacific Ocean in historic times.[4] The most recent collapse occurred on Ritter Island in 1888 but it only generated 12-15 metre waves, which although they killed 3,000 people on surrounding islands were not megatsunamis and did not cause widespread devastation.

The most recent megatsunamis, such as the one at Lituya Bay in 1958 and in the Vajont Dam in 1963, have occurred as a result of landslides in largely enclosed bodies of waters and their effects have been limited.

Other recent megatsunamis include the 40 metre high waves generated by the collapse of Krakatoa during its eruption in 1883 which killed 36,000 people on Java, Sumatra and the small islands around them; and the collapse of much of Santorini during its cataclysmic eruption around 3,500 years ago which produced a 100-150 metre wave that struck the north coast of Crete after travelling 70 kilometres. However, these megatsunamis did not propagate thousands of miles to cause more widespread damage, in part leading to the controversy about whether the waves produced by island collapses travel great distances in the same way that tsunamis do.[5]

[edit] Prehistoric

In the Norwegian Sea, the Storegga Slide caused a megatsunami 7,000 years ago. Extensive geological investigations indicate that the risk of a re-occurrence is minimal.

There is evidence of a megatsunami-type freshwater disaster that occurred 10,000 to 20,000 years ago can be seen at Seton Portage, British Columbia (not far north of Harrison Lake) where a huge chunk of the Cayoosh Range suddenly slid north into what had been a large lake spanning the area from Lillooet, British Columbia to near Birken, in the Gates Valley or Pemberton Pass to the southwest. The event has not been studied much in modern times but the proto-lake must have been at least as deep as its two present-day halves, Seton and Anderson Lakes, on either side of the Portage, suggesting that the wave created by the giant landslide must have been comparable to Lituya Bay.

They have also been generated by bolide impacts. There are indications that a giant tsunami was generated by the bolide impact that created the Chesapeake Bay impact crater, a shallow-water near-shore impact off the eastern North American coastline about 35.5 million years ago, in the late Eocene Epoch.

[edit] Megatsunami threats

Volcanic islands (such as Réunion and the Hawaiian Islands) can cause megatsunamis to hit other nearby islands in the same chain because often they are structurally little more than large, unstable piles of loosely aggregated material heaped up by successive eruptions. Evidence for large landslides has been found in the form of extensive underwater debris aprons around them composed of the material which has slipped into the ocean. In recent years five such debris aprons have been found in the Hawaiian Islands alone.

Some geologists speculate that the most likely candidate for the source of the next large-scale megatsunami is the island of La Palma, in the Canary Islands. During the 1949 eruption the western half of the Cumbre Vieja ridge slipped four metres downwards into the Atlantic Ocean. It is believed that this process was driven by the pressure caused by the rising magma heating and vaporising water trapped within the structure of the island, causing the island's structure to be pushed apart. The island is still considered active, though quiescent at present, but it is expected to erupt again some time in the next few hundred years. Were this to happen it is speculated that a megatsunami would be created as the western half of the island, weighing perhaps 500 billion tonnes, catastrophically slides into the ocean in a single event, causing local wave heights of hundreds of metres and a likely height of around 10–25 m at the Caribbean and the Eastern North American seaboard coast several hours later. However, this is speculative since there is disagreement whether it would in fact happen, when, or how likely it is.

There is also disagreement amongst scientists as to if an eruption of Cumbre Vieja would cause a single large landslide (or a series of smaller landslides) and even if such a landslide would generate a tsunami capable of crossing the Atlantic. The Tsunami Society issued a statement in 2003 that such collapses are rare and occur at intervals of thousands or millions of years, that the risk of La Palma collapsing was over-dramatized, and that although the catastrophic collapse of the islands of Krakatoa and Santorini produced megatsunamis in the local region, huge waves did not propagate across oceans to cause similar devastation on more distant coasts, adding that evidence (including computer simulations and experiments with models) suggests this type of wave does not travel great distances in the same way that normal tsunamis do. [6]

Besides fjords in Alaska, many locations face threats of localized, but still potentially dangerous, megatsunami-type waves. Some geologists speculate that an unstable rock face at Mount Breakenridge above the north end of the giant fresh-water fjord of Harrison Lake in the Fraser Valley in southwestern British Columbia could collapse into the lake, generating a large wave that might destroy the town of Harrison Hot Springs at the south end.

[edit] Movies

Fictional megatsunamis are a favorite subject of many films, given their undoubted visual impact; these megatsunamis are often caused by bolide impacts, extraterrestrial causes and other dramatic causes, rather than by landslides. Examples of this are the movies Deep Impact, Die Another Day, the director's cut of The Abyss and The Day After Tomorrow. The film Armageddon also mentions megatsunamis, but only a non-featured one which is told to be expected as "three miles high".

[edit] References

  1. ^ USGS Website. Geology of Interactions of Volcanoes, Snow, and Water: Tsunami on Spirit Lake early during 18 May 1980 eruption
  2. ^ Mega-tsunami: Wave of Destruction. Transcript. BBC Two television programme, first broadcast 12 October 2000
  3. ^ Mega-tsunami: Wave of Destruction. Background article. BBC Two television programme first broadcast 12 October 2000
  4. ^ Surfing the Wave, Leslie Mullen, Astrobiology Magazine, 13 September 2004
  5. ^ Surfing the Wave, Leslie Mullen, Astrobiology Magazine, 13 September 2004
  6. ^ Mega Tsunami hazards, The Tsunami Society, 15 January 2003

[edit] See also

[edit] Further reading

EVALUATION OF THE THREAT OF MEGA TSUNAMI GENERATION FROM POSTULATED MASSIVE SLOPE FAILURES OF ISLAND STRATOVOLCANOES ON LA PALMA, CANARY ISLANDS, AND ON THE ISLAND OF HAWAII, George Pararas-Carayannis Science of Tsunami Hazards, Vol 20, No.5, pages 251-277, 2002.

http://www.drgeorgepc.com/TsunamiMegaEvaluation.html

Ward, S.N. and Day, S. 2001. Cumbre Vieja Volcano — Potential collapse and tsunami at La Palma, Canary Islands. Geophysical Research Letters, 28, 17 pp. 3397–3400.

[edit] External links