Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-08 Christian Democracy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
State: Closed
Requested By: Jobjörn
Other Parties: Itake
Mediated By: Alan.ca
Comments: Closed at Applicant's request. Situation had been resolved.

Contents

[edit] Mediation Case: 2006-12-08 Christian Democracy

Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator and refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Mediation Cabal: Coordination Desk.


[edit] Request Information

Request made by: Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 23:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Where is the issue taking place?
At the article on Christian Democracy.
Who's involved?
Myself (Jobjörn) and Itake.
What's going on?
A heated debate over whether the italic part of the phrase "In contrast to socialism, supports capitalism and a market economy, does not advocate class struggle, and unlike revolutionary socialism, rejects violence as a means to achieve social change." should be included.
What would you like to change about that?
I'd like the opinions of some other editors in order to reach a consensus, as it is quite clear that Itake and I won't reach one.
Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
No, it's cool.

[edit] Mediator response

Has the opposing party agreed to mediation? Is there a cited source for the statement? What wikipedia policies are involved in this dispute?

Closed as per requestor.

[edit] Compromise offers

This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.

[edit] Discussion

While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.