Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-28 Metropolis Magazine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
Article: Metropolis (Japanese magazine), Crisscross and National Union of General Workers
State: New
Requested By: Wanzhen
Other Parties: sparkzilla

Contents

[edit] Mediation Case: 2006-11-28 Metropolis Magazine

Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator and refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Mediation Cabal: Coordination Desk.


[edit] Request Information

Request made by: Wanzhen
Where is the issue taking place?
... Metropolis (Japanese magazine), Crisscross and National Union of General Workers
Who's involved?
... sparkzilla
What's going on?
... These pages for Metropolis (Japanese magazine) and Crisscross were created by sparkzilla who is the owner of Metropolis Magazine and Crisscross. He is promoting his own business which is a violation of Wikipedia policy. Further he has created a link at the National Union of General Workers to his magazine to further promote it
What would you like to change about that?
... remove link and comment at National Union of General Workers and delete Metrpolis (Magazine) and Crisscross pages and any other disciplinary action that follows for violating Wikipedia policy
Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
... wan_zhn@yahoo.com

[edit] Mediator response

[edit] Compromise offers

This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.

[edit] Discussion

While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.

I'm not sure a dispute is actual taking place here, and I suggest this case should be closed. I suggest the rquester reads WP:N, and if he believes the articles are in breach of the notability policies, he should send them to WP:AFD. Computerjoe's talk 18:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)