Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-09-11 Chealer, APT

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
Article: Advanced Packaging Tool
State: Closed
Requested By: Chris Cunningham
Other Parties: Chealer
Mediated By: Addhoc (talk contribs)
Comments: Probably going to close soon...

Contents

[edit] Mediation Case: 2006-09-11 Chealer, APT

Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator and refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Mediation Cabal: Coordination Desk.


[edit] Request Information

Request made by: Chris Cunningham 14:01, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Where is the issue taking place?

The Advanced Packaging Tool article right now; was on GNU GRUB earlier but that's petered out. On 20 September 2006 it appears that it might have spread to Ubuntu (Linux distribution).

Who's involved?

Me and user:Chealer.

What's going on?

A childish revert war. We've reached a sort of consensus on the technical aspects, but minor changes are being reverted without justification. I've attempted to discuss this on his talk page to be greeted with derision. Arguments made are ignored. It's not an ideological revert, it's reverting a copy edit seemingly for the sake of causing irritation.

What would you like to change about that?

I'd prefer to be able to edit articles knowing they won't be reverted out of spite.

Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?

Fine out here in the open.

[edit] Mediator response

[edit] Compromise offers

This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.

[edit] Discussion

While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.