Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-02-09 Mobile Suit Gundam SEED Destiny
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Request for cabal mediation
[edit] Request Information
- Request made by: Draconins 12:47, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
- ...At article Mobile Suit Gundam Seed Destiny Criticism section and possibly further to Trivia section
- Who's involved?
- ...Some users including Me.
- What's going on?
- ...A going dispute that have just started to Edit Wars. It seem we have different point of view about NPOV of Criticism section (Which currently removed). See the talk page about dispute of the article. The users: User:Danny_Lilithborne, User:67.161.165.166 have started an edit war by time I edit this article. I request assistance to prevent further war.
- What would you like to change about that?
- ... Stop the possible real edit wars, thinking calmly and do not quickly just remove some article which is under discussion. Please mediate the discussion.
- If you'd prefer we work discreetly, how can we reach you?
- ...If you wish to work discreetly, please contact me at draconins(at)yahoo(dot)com
[edit] Comments by others
I agree that some of the material of Criticism is important to be listed. But I would suggest of shortening the article to remove pieces of information that aren't neccassary, such as things that are too much of an opinion rather than fact such as the information in the third paragraph needs to be shortened or the fourth paragraph that compares the Gundam Seed Destiny mobile suits with other mobile suits from older Gundam series. My personal opinion on this is that the user Danny Lilithborne was on the right idea to shorten this page, but went too far in deleting the entire Criticism section, rather than to shorten it. --Adv193 03:40, February 10th 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mediator response
User:Danny Lilithborne and the annon editor is very close to breaking 3rr, and is close to being blocked sorry, my view is that remove the critism section UNLESS sources can be found for them, to comfirm the NPOV policy. If sources are found, then replace it back to the article, but with no sources, I look at that as POV fancruft and other stuff and should be removed. I hope that help. --Jaranda wat's sup 21:11, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- I'll keep from reverting the page until the dispute is resolved. But I think the size of the Criticism section speaks for itself, better than any argument I could make. Oh, and TINC ;) Danny Lilithborne 23:56, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
I removed the criticism section until sources are found, per WP:CITE. Case should be closed --Jaranda wat's sup 19:52, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
