User talk:Mdhennessey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 Welcome
2 Thanks for the Wikihalo
3 {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
4 Mission Nuestra Señora Reina de los Angeles
- 4.1 Please stop
- 4.2 Edit Warring
5 Talk:Mission San Antonio de Pala

[edit] Welcome

Hello Mdhennessey! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for contributing. Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Best of luck. Have fun! Rory096 20:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
Where to ask a question Help Desk
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

[edit] Thanks for the Wikihalo

I apreciate the nod!--Lord Kinbote 17:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}

Well done on the template, stands out much better next to {{Replaceable fair use}} now. // Laughing Man 04:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mission Nuestra Señora Reina de los Angeles

Why on earth did you revert me? That last edit by by User:Lordkinbote not only was misinformed, but was against the consensus being worked on in the talk page and is tactually wrong. ---evrik ^(talk) 20:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

First of all, I posted that the article be renamed, and discussion was not done yet so any major changes were premature. I have also posted my sources and the logic behind what I'm trying to do. There were only 21 missions, and Mission Nuestra Señora Reina de los Angeles was not one of them. --evrik ^(talk) 20:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Which of the three commentaries are you referring to:

I don't have a problem listing the other churches in the article, just not a missions. If it wasn't a mission, it shouldn't be called mission. --evrik ^(talk) 20:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

What am I not getting? Mission Nuestra Señora Reina de los Angeles should be named La Iglesia de Nuestra Señora Reina de los Angeles. There should be no article named Mission Nuestra Señora Reina de los Angeles. --evrik ^(talk) 20:28, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
What about Mission San Antonio de Pala? It was an assistencia.--evrik ^(talk) 20:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Missions and assistencias were substantively different things. While a mission might have been a church, not all churches were missions.--evrik ^(talk) 20:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Specious? Hardly. Show me some cites that say asitencias were considered mission? Please elucidate me.--evrik ^(talk) 20:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, specious. Take a look at Spanish missions article for one. This web site [1] not only defines the term, but clearly states that Mission los Angeles was an asistencia. Mdhennessey 20:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

You just proved my point. Asistencias were not considered missions. and the article refers to La Placita as Old Plaza Church in Los Angeles and not as a mission. --evrik ^(talk) 21:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
This change to the article Spanish missions in California is another example of the changes I see should be made. --evrik ^(talk) 22:53, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop

Please stop this edit war and discussion it out on the talk page. --evrik ^(talk) 21:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit Warring

Would you two please stop your edit warring. --evrik ^(talk) 21:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't like getting tage teamed. Do you think I want to waste time fighting over this? --evrik ^(talk)

Multiple editors taking up views in opposition to yours is not "tag teaming." You are the one perpetuating this issue at this point.--Lord Kinbote 19:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

FYI on the above.--Lord Kinbote 19:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)