User talk:Mcks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Re: neutrality

Please discuss the issue at the talk page of the article. Generally, it is better to edit the wording rather than to mass revert or delete.--Jiang 08:13, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Neutrality is an issue that deserves discerning. It involves reading what is on the line and what is in between the line. Berkeley was cited three to four times as an example here, along with its rankings. If the sole purpose were to compare public versus private, I could think of other ways to do so. Berkeley is a good institution. Don't get me wrong. But, that is not the contention here. I am afraid that many ranking citations are used to make the "richer" gets "richer" and the "poorer" gets "poorer" or to advance certain ulterior motives of the writer. --mcks

The motives of the writer do not matter. Only the content matters. But I'm fine with your latest edit of that article - good job! --Jiang 05:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jorge Cham

Please don't remove speedy delete tags (like {{db-bio}}) from your own articles. Even after editing this article to reflect notability, let an administrator who comes to look at the speedy delete decide whether to keep it or not. The article is much better now and should survive the deletion review no problem. -- dcclark (talk) 22:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! Appreciate the help.--Mcks 22:27, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Looking for members to join Project Boston

I noticed you are from Boston. I am looking for people to join Project Boston in order to clean up and expand wikipedia articles directly related to Boston. If you feel like helping out please join up. Markco1 16:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC)