Talk:Max Dehn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] History of Dehn's Lemma

I remember that Stillwell's book on Dehn and some selected papers mentions there is correspondence between Dehn and Kneser soon after Dehn claimed Dehn's Lemma. They were unable to resolve the problem, and Kneser published his conclusions in 1929.

I don't have the book, unfortunately, but maybe someone (or me, if I get the time) could look up Stillwell's book.

This may be something of a picky detail, but since this is a common mistake made by many sources, here's another way for Wikipedia to do better!--Chan-Ho Suh 08:27, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)

It is true that Dehn and Helmuth Kneser corresponded about the Lemma in 1929. You can find A Guide to the Max Dehn Papers, 1899-1979 online.

Charles Matthews 08:53, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I guess I wasn't very clear. What I am saying is that they may have corresponded about this much earlier than 1929. The source you cite does not have all his papers, and does include some correspondence in 1929. However, I distinctly recall that Stillwell had access to letters in the Dehn family archive, which included some letters between Kneser and Dehn. I'll have to check the book.
The other thing that needs to be checked is if it was Kneser that really discovered the mistake. My memory of the nature of the correspondence is very fuzzy, but it may be that Dehn already knew of the mistake. A picky distinction, as I said, but in the interest of accuracy and so forth....--Chan-Ho Suh 09:31, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Forced to retire

In 1922 Dehn succeeded Ludwig Bieberbach at Frankfurt, where he stayed until he was forced to retire in 1935. Can we be more accurate/clear here? He was removed from his post by the Nazis, because he was a Jew. At least, that is what other on-line pages say: http://www.maa.org/features/050505may_archives.html. I haven't looked at the Dehn Papers myself. Sam nead 16:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)