Maximum wage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The neutrality of this article is disputed.
Please see the discussion on the talk page.

A maximum wage is a state enforced limit on how much income an individual can earn. This is a related concept that is complimentary to the minimum wage used currently by some governments to enforce minimum earnings. Both a maximum and minimum wage are methods by which wealth can be redistributed within a society.

Advocates argue that a maximum wage could limit the possibility for inflation of a currency or economy, similar to the way a minimum wage may limit deflation. This limitation is achieved by creating a relative economic bar, using both pieces of legislation, to implement an economy that cannot inflate/deflate past the point of the relative maximum/minimum wage (respectively). Accordingly, the economy would hover between points of inflation and deflation, and the populace would live between the two economic wage points. Supporters argue this as advantageous. However, economists of the mainstream, if not dominant, Monetarism view, would say the above argument is incorrect and inflation is controlled by the growth in the money supply according to the quantity theory of money. [citation needed]

Supporters say a maximum wage could also reduce devaluation of a currency by limiting the amount any member of the populace can earn, and consequently effectively limiting the availability of currency. This statement is also not consistent with the Monetarism view.

There are no serious mainstream groups advocating a maximum wage.

Contents

[edit] Implementation

Although no major economy has a direct earnings limit, some economies do have highly progressive tax structures in the form of scaled taxation.

[edit] Maximum Liquid Wealth

A maximum liquid wealth policy restricts the amount of liquid wealth an individual is permitted to maintain, while giving them unrestricted access to non-liquid assets. That is to say, an individual may earn as much as they like during a given time period, but all earnings must be re-invested (spent) within an equivalent time period; all earnings not re-invested within this time period would be seized.

This policy is only arguably a valid maximum wage implementation, as it does not actually restrict the wages a person is allowed to maintain, but only restricts the amount of actual currency they are allowed to hold at any given time. Proponents of the policy argue that it enforces the ideals of a maximum wage without restricting actual capital growth or economic incentive.

Proponents believe wealth that is not re-invested in the economy is harmful to economic growth; that actual liquid currency not re-invested timely is indicative of an unfair trade, in which an individual has paid more for a good/service than the good/service was worth. This stems from the belief that currency should represent the actual value of a good or service.

When this policy is imposed, individual savings can only be held as solid assets like stocks, bonds, business, and property. Opponents argue that since a maximum liquid wealth policy makes no allowance for individual savings, it therefore assumes the non-importance of a bank and the loans that banks provide. Loans being essential to the economy, opponents argue, banks are an essential economic institution. Proponents of the maximum liquid wealth policy respond that government could be directly responsible for supplying loans to individuals; they also add that such an arrangement could result in vastly lower interest rates. Of course, proponents of a conservative (small) government would not find this situation ideal.

[edit] Relative Earnings Limit

A relative earnings limit is a limit imposed upon a business, to the amount of compensation an individual is allowed, as a specific multiple of a company's lowest earner; or directly relative to the amount of individuals a company employs and the average compensation provided to each individual employee, not including a certain percentage of the company's top earners. The former implementation has the advantage of limiting wage gaps. The latter implementation has the advantage of encouraging employment opportunities, as increasing employment would be a way for employers to boost their maximum earnings. A compromise would be to base the limit upon the number of employees had to a specific company and the compensation of that company's lowest earner.

To moderate self-employeed individuals, the maximum would be based on the average compensation of the nation's employed (GDP Per Capita) and a specific multiplier.

[edit] Direct Earnings Limit

A direct earnings limit is a limit placed directly, usually as a number in terms of currency, upon the amount of compensation any individual is allowed to earn in a given time period.

[edit] Scaled Taxation

Main article: progressive tax

Scaled taxation is a method of progressive taxation that raises the rate at which the principal sum is taxed, directly relative to the amount of the principal. This type of taxation is normally applied to income taxes, although other types of taxation can be scaled.

In the case of a maximum wage, a scaled tax would be applied so that the top earners in a society would be taxed extremely large percentages of their income. Modern income tax systems, allowing salary raises to be reflected by a raise in after tax income, tax each individual note of currency in each particular bracket at the same rate.[1] An example follows.

Calculations are made for the top of each bracket
Currency Bracket: Dollars Taxed: Rate: Taxes: After Tax Income: Percentage of Income Kept:
$1 - $40,000 $40,000 15% $6,000 $34,000 85%
$40,000 - $100,000 $60,000 35% $21,000 $34,000 + $39,000 = $73,000 73%
$100,000 - $175,000 $75,000 50% $37,500 $73,000 + $37,500 = $110,500 63%
$175, 000 - $250,000 $75,000 60% $45,000 $110,500 + $30,000 = $140,500 56%
$250,000 - $500,000 $250,000 75% $187,500 $140,500 + $62,000 = $203,000 40.6%
$500,000+ $1+ 90% more than $0.90 greater than $203,000 less than 40.6%

[edit] Criticism of maximum wages

Critics of a maximum wage such as Milton Friedman argue that it would reduce incentive to innovate and for highly skilled workers to pursue demanding jobs. This decline in innovation would be problematic as innovation is one source of economic growth.

Austrian economists argue that inflation is not caused by wages but by governments printing money. In addition, they highlight the fact money is a commodity whose value is subject to supply and demand.

Furthermore, Austrian economists and others have argued that given the diverse preferences of individuals within society it would be impossible to determine at what level the maximum wage should be set or what 'sufficient wealth' is.

[edit] History

Maximum wage has been imposed by some social democratic governments such as Sweden in the 1960s. However, the policy was criticised and campaigners later had a "tax rebellion" and demanded the government reduce the top marginal taxes.

In his 2000 run for the Green Party presidential nomination, Jello Biafra advocated implementation of a maximum wage in the United States. Biafra claimed he would increase taxes for the wealthy and reduce taxes for those in the lower and middle classes.

In England, the "Statute of Artificers of 1563" implemented statutes of compulsory labor and fixed maximum wage scales; Justices of the Peace could fix wages according "to the plenty or scarcity of the time".

To counteract the scarcity of labor and increase prevailing wages, American colonies in the 17th century created a ceiling wage and minimum hours of employment. [2]

[edit] Related Concepts

Maximum Total Earnings legislation suggests that when a person has accumulated sufficient wealth that they can survive on the interest alone they must stop working and allow someone else to work. This theoretical concept assumes there is a set amount of work to be done in an economy, and is not supported by any major form of modern economic thought. Attempts to reduce unemployment by removing people from the labor force, as is proposed by this theory, have been a failure.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ TaxAlmanac - Online tax collaboration
  2. ^ U.S. Department of Labor history on wage laws in England and the American Colonies

[edit] External links