Talk:Maurer-Cartan form

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Who is Maurer in the Maurer-Cartan form? --romanm (talk) 21:22, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] If G is embedded n GL(n)

We know that \omega:T_gG\rightarrow T_eG. Quoting from the article, "If G is embedded in GL(n), then ω = g − 1dg."

This definition confused me for a while. As one would correctly assume, the first g is really Lg, left multiplication by g. However, the g in dg is not Lg, but rather a (local) function R^k\rightarrow R^{n^2}, where k is the dimension of G. Thus dg is essentially the identity map T_gG\rightarrow T_gG, since g in this case takes any point in G (viewed in Rk) to itself (now viewed in R^{n^2}).

If we were to interpret (incorrectly, as I had) the second g also as Lg, then dg would denote a map dg:T_hG\rightarrow T_{gh}G, in which case the composite g − 1dg, evaluated at the point g, would be a map from T_gG\rightarrow T_gG \neq T_eG (unless g = e).

You can regard it as a formal identity in Rn x n, so that g = (xij) and dg = (dxij). This is useful for concrete calculations. More formally, g-1 is (L_{g^{-1}})_*, and dg is the identity map of the tangent space. Silly rabbit 23:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)