Talk:Maurer-Cartan form
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Who is Maurer in the Maurer-Cartan form? --romanm (talk) 21:22, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
- It's Ludwig Maurer. Charles Matthews 06:06, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] If G is embedded n GL(n)
We know that . Quoting from the article, "If G is embedded in GL(n), then ω = g − 1dg."
This definition confused me for a while. As one would correctly assume, the first g is really Lg, left multiplication by g. However, the g in dg is not Lg, but rather a (local) function , where k is the dimension of G. Thus dg is essentially the identity map , since g in this case takes any point in G (viewed in Rk) to itself (now viewed in ).
If we were to interpret (incorrectly, as I had) the second g also as Lg, then dg would denote a map , in which case the composite g − 1dg, evaluated at the point g, would be a map from (unless g = e).
- You can regard it as a formal identity in Rn x n, so that g = (xij) and dg = (dxij). This is useful for concrete calculations. More formally, g-1 is , and dg is the identity map of the tangent space. Silly rabbit 23:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)