User talk:Massimamanno
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi. Are you the 62.101.126.212? Ultramarine 19:59, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Assuming you are, would you support creating a new article just for the specific historical cases, that is moving User:Salix alba/History of conflict between democracies to a real Wikipedia article? I think it would improve the DPT article which is getting quite long. However, the user Septentrionalis will very probably immediately put it up for deletion and have previously managed to get different earlier versions deleted. See this: [1] regarding a version similar to this: [2]. Do you think that any of these claimed problems remain? As far as I can tell, the main problem that many editors saw was that the earlier versions were not neutral. They did not list many arguments for these conflicts being wars being wars between democracies, mainly because many researchers do not list any arguments but simply state these conflicts as exceptions. However, we have now added many arguments so I hope that this improved version can be seen as neutral.Ultramarine 20:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- I would certainly vote for keeping the page Massimamanno
- What would be an appropriate title?Ultramarine 23:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Earlier versions have been called "Possible wars between liberal democracies" or something similar. Ultramarine 23:41, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- The current title of the Salix Alba talk page would be best in my opinion because it is actually slightly biased on the opposite side, and would make the whole article more acceptable. Otherwise, one could add a (possible) in parenthesis, like "History of (possible) conflict between democracies", which states that it may, or may not, be happened. I would not recommend "Possible wars between liberal democracies" because it somewhat appears to say too much against the hypotesis. Massimamanno
- Good point. Do you think there should a "(possible)"Ultramarine 00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hm? Yes, the title could contain a (possible) Massimamanno
- I will contact some of involved editors to see if they think the current version ok.Ultramarine 00:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Probably better to wait and see what happens with current discssion on the DPT talk page.Ultramarine 02:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hm? Yes, the title could contain a (possible) Massimamanno
- Good point. Do you think there should a "(possible)"Ultramarine 00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- The current title of the Salix Alba talk page would be best in my opinion because it is actually slightly biased on the opposite side, and would make the whole article more acceptable. Otherwise, one could add a (possible) in parenthesis, like "History of (possible) conflict between democracies", which states that it may, or may not, be happened. I would not recommend "Possible wars between liberal democracies" because it somewhat appears to say too much against the hypotesis. Massimamanno
- I would certainly vote for keeping the page Massimamanno
Hi. Please restore the images. Pmanderson/Septentrionalis will list it for deletion no matter what and it may help persuade some quick voters that this is not a crank theory invented on Wikipedia which some seem to have thought previously.Ultramarine 07:26, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] On Wikipedia
Good work. Have you read this? [3]Ultramarine 13:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
