User talk:Marudubshinki/Archive 33
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Thanks! (re: one millionth article)
Thanks for your kind words! --Nach0king 09:29, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Bah! I know this thanks are just to lull me into a sense of complacency so you can steal the 2 millionth article which all know to be rightly mine. --maru (talk) contribs 15:07, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
For putting up with me and always helping me out with my horrid editing I award you this Maru put it where you like.
You have really helped me with editing example when I first started you nagged me to sign my comments, then you helped me with charts such as TIE Crawler, then you said no copyvios and constantly you put up with my pitiful editing. Thanks really. --Dr. Mahongany
[edit] Edit Counts
Hey, you know you can just link to an edit counter like Interiot's tool rather than manually updating the count, right? --maru (talk) contribs 18:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Do you mean like edits?user=Dark jedi requiem&dbname=enwiki p this or is there a way to make it graph it on the page? (For people too lazy or uncaring to click the link.) --Dark jedi requiem 23:37, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- So far as I know, there is no way to have a template or anything show updated results automatically- I mean, short of having a script or program fetch the results periodically, generate an image or textual representation in some way, upload that representation, and edit a page adding that representation, but that's a lot of work and is error-prone. --maru (talk) contribs 15:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hey - possible revenant?
Is it me, or does User:JediOrder remind you a bit of stormtropr? He makes a series of awkward edits, although how he mainly focuses on uploading his "own" images and messing with wikilinks... --Deckiller 02:57, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- He does, a little, but he doesn't seem to have the same obsession with the infoboxes. --maru (talk) contribs 15:11, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA results
Thank you for your constructive critisizm during my RfA! It has decided to postpone making me an administrator based upon recent consensus (or lack thereof). Thanks for the kind remarks and I hope to continue to see you around the project. Cheers, ZsinjTalk 08:36, 4 March 2006 (UTC) |
- You just went in too early, Zsinj. My advice is to wait a few months, and maybe spend those months collaborating with other users on some articles- peer review and FAC are good places for that, or you could join a WikiProject. It's a good idea to have a few superlative articles to show you can do more than just handle recent changes. --maru (talk) contribs 14:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Help me, Maru
Help me please, My username is User:Xchrisblackx but I tried to get on today my password was changed and I got a vandal warning the only way I can prove to you this is me is my name is Dr. Mahogany and my old password was rocker what can I do? Just put any help you have on my talk page. --Anon.
- Sorry- I can't help. That account doesn't seem to be blocked, and I have no way of knowing that you are in fact who you say you are. Even were I inclined to help, the best I could do is block the account- admins can't change the password or anything like that. --maru (talk) contribs 14:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- Is there anything I can do? --Anon.
-
-
-
- Thanks. Sorry to bug you. One more thing, is there a possible way to find who this guy is? --Anon.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Can you tell me a user with one? --Anon.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Wikipedia:Requests for CheckUser. --maru (talk) contribs 17:43, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- "Help me Obi-Maru Kenobi, you're our only hope!" :P —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kross (talk • contribs).
[edit] Illuminatus! peer review
hi, you complained in Wikipedia:Peer review/The Illuminatus! Trilogy that there was not enough plot summary. can you check the article again and see if its ok now? The Illuminatus! Trilogy. Thanks. --Zzzzz 21:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Well, it's adequate now. However, to be better, it still needs to cover some of the more interesting ideas and amusing plot turns and elements, IMO. --maru (talk) contribs 01:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- The Illuminatus! article is now up for "featured article" status. please go to Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Illuminatus! Trilogy to vote Support or Oppose with your comments. cheers. --Zzzzz 17:55, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Changes to the Virtuozzo Content
Hello, I am just learning to look at the history on Wikipedia, and I see that you have made some content changes to Virtuzzo. The changes are interesting and I see just the first change you say "relatively" isolated. Can you please clarify for me why you changed isolated to relatively isolated? On what are you basing this characterization? Thanks. --Carla
- Because it is a software solution, not virtualizing at the hardware level; I believe it must be inherently less isolated than isolation done at an even lower level. --maru (talk) contribs 22:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Caamas WOTC.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Caamas WOTC.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 08:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Small Problem with vandals
I'm unblocked but it seems that under Checkuser all vandals that vandalize my userpage are from my area? --Dr. Mahogany
- Well, then- that tells you where to start looking for the responsible parties. --maru (talk) contribs 16:56, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- I guess you're right but where to start? --Dr. Mahogany 17:30, 9 March 2006 (UTC)