User talk:Mariontognoni

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. This is not free advertising space. Further vandalism may lead to blocks without warning.

[edit] Re: Jumbling Towers Vandalism

Hey Mike. I have noticed that you ignorantly removed my section and review information from the Jumbling Towers wiki article. My buddy Tyler and I keep this up (seeing as we both wrote it) to date as more reviews/achievments/information becomes available on the band. We (the band and I) are childhood friends. I would not "vandalize" something about my comrades that I wrote. That's proposterous. You are attacking the very people who are adding truth and credibility to wikipedia. Nothing on their page is advertisment, it is band reviews and anything else the guys decide to delve into. Thanks.

I ask that you please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:List of bad article ideas. Material describing a product with a biased point of view and linking to a for-profit website is almost by definition advertising. Michaelbusch 00:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Everyother band site has external links to their reveiws and are no more/less bias than I. I am just writing down fact.

I contest the validity of the first statement, but if it is true, then I have great sympathy for WikiProject:Music. Michaelbusch 00:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Jumbling Vanalism Again??

I have read the terms mike. You take out my edits claiming "bias", yet allow "They are best known for their lively and witty performances along with an original sound." This is just a "biased". You nor I can prove that they are "witty" or maintain some sort of "original sound", no more than you can prove the statements I wrote that you have omitted. make up your mind pleae. And please stop correcting an article maybe two people veiw a year. Thanks.

I've flagged the entire article as unencyclopedic, because, as you say, it is biased. That an article is low-traffic is not a reason to not correct it or have it removed. In fact, it makes corrections all that more important. There have been many requests that editors pay more attention to such articles. Michaelbusch 00:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../m/a/r/User_talk%7EMariontognoni_b3bc.html"