Talk:Martingale representation theorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
This article needs more context around or a better explanation of technical details to make it more accessible to general readers and technical readers outside the specialty, without removing technical details. See below for more information.


Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 29/3/2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

I have proposed deletion for this article. The theorem stated in this way is substantially uncorrect. IMHO, it needs a major re-writing. So, before doing the eventual job, we should decide if this theorem should be on wikipedia or not. If yes, I could eventually work it out. gala.martin (what?) 23:31, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

I agree that the statement of the theorem is poor, but it is a start. Why don't we just rewrite it? Perhaps we could restructure it by the following layout?
1. the statement for continuous martingales and give a few references for the proof,
2. the statement for general martingales, and few references for the proof
3. then perhaps some motivation for it along the lines of saying that Brownian motion is the canonical continuous martingale, while compensated compound Poisson processes are the canonical processes for martingales with jumps and that all martingales are just integrals of a Brownian motion plus some sort of compensated compound Poisson process, and lastly
4. some places where the theorem is used such as in finance where it is used to prove the existence of portfolios AJR_1978


Please, note that discussion about deletion is going on this page (as stated in the template). gala.martin (what?) 17:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../m/a/r/Talk%7EMartingale_representation_theorem_9a06.html"