Talk:Marc Storace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Marc Storace is a former good article candidate. There are suggestions below for which areas need improvement to satisfy the good article criteria. Once the objections are addressed, the article can be renominated as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a review.

Date of review: 28 November 2006

Marc Storace is a former good article candidate. There are suggestions below for which areas need improvement to satisfy the good article criteria. Once the objections are addressed, the article can be renominated as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a review.

Date of review: 13 December 2006

[edit] GA stuff

At the very least, this needs more third party references, a prose check, and the images need to be cut down a bit. It's very difficult to read with the current layout of images. Get some newspaper/magazine sources in there and rearrange the images, and you'll be on your way. Good luck! --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

  • References from interviews added, some images taken out, prose checked. Muteherotalk 17:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

The lead is way way too short. It should summarize the article and be 2-3 paras long. Rlevse 23:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Lead Improved. Muteherotalk 15:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Since I failed this originally, I won't review it again, but I don't think the two extra interviews are really going to cut it on this. Are there really no magazine/newspaper articles that covered this guy? --badlydrawnjeff talk 18:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • I haven't managed to find any. Lots of interviews, not much else. Article GA nomination put on hold to see if I can find some. Muteherotalk 19:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
    • I failed it again since problems have not been addressed, and the 7 day time limit on hold has passed. If additional sources can be referenced, please nominate again. --Jayron32 20:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)