Talk:Mandingo (porn star)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Length
Anyone who has seen one of Mandigo's movies will know that his penis is atleast 12 inches long, yet people who update this Wiki entry are constantly changing it to 10 or below. This is inaccurate and annoys me to no end. If you're jealous or something because you're not as big, get over it. This entry needs to remain accurate.CJ
Good point CJ, seeing his movies he's definitely an anomaly. By the way this addresses the concern cited in the following paragraph as well.
[edit] Innacurate at Best!
This quite short and apparently biased article on the pornstar Mandingo is innacurate at best! Does it make sense to categorize someone who possesses a 7x-inch penis as being very extremely 'well-endowed'? A 7x-inch penis is slightly above the size of the average penis. According to the Alfred C. Kinsey Institute for Sex Research, the average penis is 6.16 inches (1). That would put both Lexington Steele and Mandingo at slightly above average, when it comes to penis size. These pornstar are clearly WAY above average! Anyone who has watched their movies can vouch for that claim. Visit the second link below to see for yourself that his penis can't possibly be a 7x-incher, regardless of distortions due to camera angle!
As matter of fact, right now Mandingo has clearly the biggest penis in porn. One can even presume that his penis is the biggest in porn history!
[edit] Accurate Bio
There is an internet movie mall called 'excalibur' films that features a more factual account of Mandingo's life along with a complete filmography (2).
[edit] Source
1. http://www.edu.uni-klu.ac.at/~amiklaut/dr_nick/answer19.htm
2. http://excaliburfilms.com/pornlist/malepgs/Mandingo.htm
[edit] Dubious content
I have removed the following text:
- Despite the humongous proportions,that makes female co-stars feel intimidated at first, once they overcome the initial pain,they find it quite pleasant and eager to participate in another scene with him .
because it doesn't look very enciclopedic, unless there is some clearly attributable source for the claim.