Talk:Manchester Monarchs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey, an attempt at building a useful ice hockey resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information).

Sports and Games Portal

Flag of New Hampshire

This article is part of Project New Hampshire; an effort to create, expand, and improve New Hampshire-related articles to a feature-quality standard.

[edit] appearance

On my browser, at least, the year-by-year record overlaps the infobox so that it's partly unreadable - that's why I moved it, before somebody moved it back. Their undo also returned duplicate material (e.g., the arena is listed twice, as are the colors, and the logo is described when it's shown right there). Standardization is good, but not if it makes an article unreadable and/or badly organized. - DavidWBrooks 17:56, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

What browser/version? ccwaters 18:42, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Firefox 1.5.0.1 - DavidWBrooks 19:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
That's what I'm running (specifically Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060209 Debian/1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-2 Firefox/1.5.0.1). I'm not seeing any issue. I typically run at 1920x1200, but I just looked at it 1024x768 and 800x600. ccwaters 19:55, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
??? That's odd ... the infobox descends further than the text, right? What happens with your brower with the year-by-year pseudo-box at that point - does it get pushed down below the infobox, leaving white space below the text, or does it squish in to the left of the infobox? - DavidWBrooks 20:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, only reversed it because there's a set format/template for the NHL/AHL pages, and they're all supposed to be identical. I don't disagree with your edit, and the repetition of info is useless, but in Wikiproject Ice Hockey people are working hard to maintain consistency in the hockey pages. That's the ONLY reason the edit was reversed.Saradanger 03:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)