Talk:Man track controversy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] To do

• sources
• other similar claims

[edit] Something doesn't make sense

The intro paragraph reads:

The man track controversy...refers to the alleged discovery of million year-old human footprints...These claims are strongly believed by strict-young earth creationists...

I know that creationists' ideas are based on faith, not logic and reason, but even so, this seems too illogical to me. Young-earth creationists believe the Earth is only some ten millenia old at most—anything on Earth dated at a million years would instantly disprove YEC in its current form (which of course is why even so few creationists are YECs). Perhaps it is the garden-variety creationists who strongly believe in the purported age and identity of these tracks? — Knowledge Seeker দ 02:21, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Good catch. It doesn't make sense. I've fixed it now, but some copy-edit is still needed. See my last edit for the changes made. Gflores ^Talk 02:51, 5 January 2006 (UTC)