Talk:Makron
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I removed the stub tag. I've played both Quake II and IV, and every possible piece of information on the Makron that can be gathered from them is included here, and more.
Contents |
[edit] Clumsy Wording
"A player can believe that Kane is accomplishing all his tasks to take revenge on Makron for being the reason he was turned into a Strogg." I'm not sure what that's trying to say, so I can't figure out how to re-word it. Can the author, or someone else who can wend their way through that sentence, please fix it? --156.34.213.83 18:07, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Why not just remove it altogether? It's a subjective issue that doesn't really contribute to the facts of this article.Ming2020 02:45, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
I had a go at re-wording this line. I also noticed the line after it wasn't necessary (it was mentioned in the next paragraph too), so I did some tweaking with the next paragraph too. JaffaCakeLover 19:09, 29 August 2006 (BST)
[edit] Makron Pic
hi, i think that the quake 2 macron pic is sorta bad, you should change it, bye.
I uploaded a larger Makron pic (and a pic for the Jorg). Can't get the exact pose of the previous pic though - can't find the 'move camera' option in q2mdlr! JaffaCakeLover 02:07, 21 August 2006 (GMT)
[edit] Sections
There is a section that tells you how to kill the Q4 makron. That seems too much like a game guide piece to me and should be removed. Bobo10512
[edit] Quake 4 Makron pic incorrect
Makron can't be seen in open space in Quake 4. I think this picture is made by "cheating" -- using the in-game console command to summon the needed monster to the current location. In the real game, Makron appears only in the rooms. --217.10.41.22 19:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
I thought it looked a bit suspicious; I just finished the game yesterday, and never fought him outside. I suppose it's a balance between an informative pic and a deceptive one; Should it be replaced at all? If so, should it be as good a screenshot as possible in one of his battles (perhaps have notarget & god turned on), or should it be taken using a model viewer? JaffaCakeLover 15:23, 30 August 2006 (BST)
I think a model viewer shot would be preferable, due to the absolute clarity of the character (neutral lighting, no backgrounds etc.) but an in-game shot as described by JaffaCakeLover would be acceptable. Makron1n 23:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
