Talk:Lynbrook High School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Contents

[edit] Article existence

Why does this deserve an article? Adam Bishop 02:49, 8 Oct 2003 (UTC)

It doesn't. Vancouverguy 03:54, 8 Oct 2003 (UTC)

It does now. ςפקιДИτς 14:43, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Article sounds too much like a praise/advertisement. It also glosses over the nasty aspects of the school, such as guzzling student's money by charging 5 cents for every piece of printing paper.

[edit] From VfD

Lynbrook High School has been kept and merged with Spectator Club

the club and school together were formerly intermixed - separating - apologies for any misrepresentation -- your friendly local refactorer, Martin 16:33, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)

  • Spectator Club - non-famous high school club. Evil saltine 01:50, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • Delete. RickK 02:44, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • The club article should be deleted, since there is a link to the HS website in the main article, where such transient details could go. Jgm 13:03, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • axe it, axe it good. Poor Yorick 02:48, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • I'm afraid I vote to keep. Inclusionism is getting to me. -- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen 14:48, Oct 9, 2003 (UTC)
    • merge article into highschool and keep highschool article. - Marshman 06:01, 10 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • Delete. Evil saltine 06:19, 11 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • Delete. -- BCorr ¤ Брайен 23:15, 11 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • I would like to propose merging into San Jose, California.
    • Delete. Gentgeen 08:35, 12 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • Delete. There must be 100s of clubs with this name, worldwide. Martin 16:33, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • School, perhaps; a club at that school, no way. Wiwaxia 20:29, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • Merge with high school articl. --Jiang 03:16, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC)
  • Lynbrook High School, the high school where the club exists. Adam Bishop 01:51, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • Keep high school. --Daniel C. Boyer 17:37, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • Delete. RickK 02:44, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • I'm sympathetic to deletion, but a high school has a higher population than many other places with Wikipedia articles: list of places with fewer than ten people. Martin 11:46, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure I see a problem with a crisp article about a particular High School, as this seems to be -- is there a particular policy about what levels of institution make acceptable entries (there are some High Schools that are more notable than some Colleges, for example)? Jgm 13:03, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • axe it, axe it good. Poor Yorick 02:48, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • merge info on club into article on school and keep as redirect -- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen 14:48, Oct 9, 2003 (UTC)
    • While it seems inconceivable that every school (highschool, secondary, etc.) should be in here, I really cannot think of any reason why not. Keep - Marshman 05:01, 10 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • Yet another thing we need to decide on: Does every high school in the world belong in Wikipedia? Seems like we're going to need a formal policy on this kind of stuff. (I vote no.) Axlrosen 19:00, 10 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • I would vote no as well...otherwise I'm going to have to write an article about my high school, it's famous because the former bass player for Kittie went there! Adam Bishop 21:21, 10 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • I can suggest as a general rule: no schools below colleges. Place a link on the appropriate town article to the school's website instead. - Marshman 03:10, 11 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • Keep Lirath Q. Pynnor
    • There's nothing about it that makes it especially well known; maybe a better idea would be to put high schools on the respective town's page. Evil saltine 06:19, 11 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • Delete. -- BCorr ¤ Брайен 23:15, 11 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • "Yet another thing we need to decide on", says Axlrosen. Not at all! There is no point in having lots of separate arbitrary rules for different types of articles. We only need one all-encompassing general rule: keep anything that can be verified; remove anything that's can't. I can't imagine that any school in the US could be founded without somebody somewhere writing about it. Therefore there is bound to be verifiable information about all of them. Therefore we can keep all of them. QED. :) This school gets about 3,650 Google matches, by the way. That's quite a lot. (The club, on the other hand, only gets 8 matches, and its own website provides only about a sentence of usable information, so I can't imagine how to get an article from that.) -- Oliver P. 06:52, 12 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • I would like to propose merging into San Jose, California.
      • The problem with that sugestion is that Santa Clara County, California has 37 high schools, with the majority either in or near San Jose. For larger cities like Los Angeles or New York, the merging of info from high school articles would be unmanagable. In this case, I say delete, yet keep the option of letting truely famous schools in open. (I hope that my two aunts who graduated from Lynbrook don't get offended) Gentgeen 08:35, 12 Oct 2003 (UTC)
        • I agree with your first two sentences, but counter your third suggestion with that old favourite, m:Wiki is not paper. -- Oliver P. 10:39, 12 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • Keep. Wartortle 22:16, 13 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • Well, what if a "college" _is_ a "high school"? Like, say, Upper Canada College? Should there be economic criteria as well? Or maybe just a rule-of-thumb type thing, such as "Have famous people attended this school? *Really* famous people? Would attending this school have impacted them significantly?" Something along those lines. Kelvin Palm 21:58, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC) 15:57, 15 Oct [GMT-6]
  • ok, I'm wavering now. The school district Lynbrook is in is famous. In the late 1990's, people from Hong Kong were buying houses in the neighborhood, sight unseen, above the asking price, in cash, just to live in this district. Lynbrook was the school everyone wanted, too. Cupertino and Fremont were ok, but Lynbrook was the star. I'm now favoring keep, but expand the article. Gentgeen 23:21, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
    • Keep, until we develop a guideline for inclusion of high school. Otherwise, I'm going to nominate every high school article I can find for deletion. --Jiang 03:16, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC)
      • In my opinion, discussing this here is just the way to develop the guideline. Andre Engels 08:41, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC)
      • Keep any article on a high school that is factual and verifiable. We're not paper, and someone may legitimately come here looking for information on a high school. It does no harm, and could be good2toise 09:53, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC)

add a section with notable students and alumni? Young chess prodigy Vinay Bhat attended this school, and Matthew Ho, another chess wizard, will be graduating this year. Eight 88888888 01:56, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Keep- it's factual information. It doesn't do any harm as toise said. --69.109.116.90 21:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reverted last edits by anon user

Edits aren't blatantly vandalism but they seem odd to me, so I reverted to the last known good version. If anon user can identify why they changes were made, they can certainly go back in. Elf | Talk 04:58, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Notes and question

I wouldn't overplay the role that Lynbrook's quality plays in housing prices in the area. I also question whether it's solely income that keeps latinos, blacks, etc. from living in the area.

Question: it lists virtually *all* extracurricular activities as being "nationally renowned"--I have a hard time believing this. Are there any sources that anyone can cite that indicates that any of them in specific are nationally renowned?

Elf | Talk 00:02, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

there are still some latinos and blacks here, but they're not that many. i just think they dont feel that comfortable in an asian-american neighborhood, but income is probably still a very important factor. 205.173.47.254 21:24, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Why phone number should not be in school article

I think its a mistake to put phone numbers in wiki articles. Virtually everybody has a web access (as this is how they get here), so they can visit the school's home page, and get the current number there. The phone number may well change, but, this article may not change. Even if this article is updated to reflect a new phone number, expired copies of the article will float around on mirrors (and maybe even CDs) for a long time after. Also, posting of phone numbers often encourages people to call, without bothering read where the school actually is. Now, other info can also (obviously) change, but if a web url is invalid, there's no harm in clicking on it. Dialing a wrong number, is bothersome. --rob 21:24, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

removed now. Cool sword 00:49, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Lynbrook and Monta Vista have been featured in a front-page Wall Street Journal article, The New White Flight. It's an interesting read.

[edit] POV tag

I agree with User:Lotsofissues's removal of the POV tag. Maybe it's not perfect, but I certainly can't find any obvious examples of POV. Jasmol 22:47, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

The last little bit about Monta Vista and Lynbrook's schools cultures being different makes it seem like Lynbrook's is better. It is definitely not true that Monta Vista is only about academics which is what that last paragraph seems to imply. Should it be taken out? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.54.161.232 (talk • contribs) .

Yup, I think that's a subjective comment and hard to prove, although I don't see that it really implies that one or the other is better. Elf | Talk 17:02, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Class presidents?

Is it really necessary to list the presidents of each class at the high school? Frankly, half the kids in the school probably don't care, let alone anyone looking on Wikipedia. Unless someone can give a good reason to keep them, I'll remove them in a few days--Metros232 02:05, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't think it should be there. ςפקιДИτς ☺ ☻ 03:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't think it's necessary; too transient. OhNoitsJamieTalk 04:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Ditto. -Will Beback 04:14, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Academics

This article needs to put less emphasis on Lynbrook's high scores. There is also a certain number of "stupid people" in the school, and not everybody here is a smartie. Many people are concerned about getting into college, but it's far from what it's like at Gunn, Palo Alto, Mission San Jose, etc. Cool sword 04:54, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Trust me, they say the same things too. -- Jjjsixsix (t)/(c) @ 04:56, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
That's what Lynbrook is best known for, so I think it should have considerable discussion in the article. Copysan 17:38, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Staff

Lots of the staff lists in the article are outdated. Should be removed or updated. Current list here: http://lhs.fuhsd.org/staffdir/

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../l/y/n/Talk%7ELynbrook_High_School_dcf0.html"