Talk:Luxemburgism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is not a valid description, since it is based on debatable buzzwords: totalitarianism, authoritarianism. This is good for propaganda and Lenin-style bashing of opponents, but not for an encyclopedia.

Also, since you are speaking of today, who are notable luxists? mikka (t) 21:15, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

I believe these objections have been addressed, and I have removed the "accuracy" and "unreferenced" tags. Chick Bowen 02:21, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

This article was nominated for deletion on October 20, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

— JIP | Talk 18:44, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Spelling

Shouldn't this article be called Luxemburgism? After all, it's named after Rosa Luxemburg (correct spelling without o). Luxembourgism sounds to me like some special ideology of the country of Luxembourg... Luis rib 21:25, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Both spellings occur in the relevant literature. I placed a redirect at the page you mention, but that doesn't preclude moving it if there's consensus to do so. If you feel strongly about it, do it. Chick Bowen 21:54, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

I feel strongly about it, for the same reason as Luis rib. Will move from Luxembourgism presently... QuartierLatin1968 Image:Flag of Anarcho syndicalism.svg 02:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Small point

Do you really think democratic socialism has nothing to do with this article, Anonymous? Funny, I see a ton of parallels between Luxemburg(ism) and various currents mentioned in that article. I'm not going to get into a revert war over it, however. QuartierLatin1968 19:20, 13 January 2006 (UTC)