From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

emptied on August 16, 2005. See history for archive.

Contents 1 Quiet title action merged to Quiet title 2 Welcome to WP:NH! 2.1 Muncwatch 2.2 New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated 3 Water Gas vs Wood Gas 3.1 Patent application/Patent prosecution articles 3.2 Still around? 3.3 Image:Halligan bar.jpg

[edit] Quiet title action merged to Quiet title

Wanted to let you know. Cheers! BD2412 T 23:22, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to WP:NH!

We'd make a template to welcome you, but whatever, we're still small enough to say hi in person. Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help you out or if you're looking for a project to sink your teeth (or I guess "fangs") into. karmafist 22:50, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Muncwatch

Maybe the instructions were hard to follow, that's my fault I guess since I assume you saw Millsfield, New Hampshire and assumed the same thing for Kilkenny, New Hampshire. When I put that edit there on muncwatch, there was no article there. Assawyer created the article a few days later[1], so I should have probably updated it, but I haven't since i've had so much to do(that was probably around 3,000 edits ago for me) lately. I haven't been able to keep up my pace because I may be taking a GIS class soon which will allow me to take on making the maps instead of just ignoring them for later like I am now. Should I make another column for the maps, seals and infoboxes? karmafist 02:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

The creation of the Kilkenny and Millsfield articles were oversights on my part. I have merged both on both versions of the page. I think I will delete the newer version in keeping with policy. Assawyer 03:27, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

No harm done, my friend. karmafist 07:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated

Actually, you might be way more useful helping out with this since you're a lawyer. It's way too big for one person, and i'm fairly inexperienced with them. karmafist 07:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Not sure what you want done. Of 23 states having a "law" category, under Category:State_law_in_the_United_States only Code of Virginia has anything remotely resembling a compendium, and that is only the list of titles in the Code! A few other states have a "code" or "law" article that comprises a law-stub having a link to the online code elsewhere. Many other places have lists of articles about important laws or decisions, such as Fundamental Laws of England. Are you aware of any other article regarding US state laws that actually includes the text, let alone the annotations? That would give us something to compare with. I, too, have little experience with NH law, being a MA lawyer. See General Laws of Massachusetts. Lupinelawyer 00:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Water Gas vs Wood Gas

Mr. L: In my article on Prof Lowe, you, in your avarice to redirect to other articles, blue lined the expression water-gas to an article on wood gas. Sir, these are two different items. Wood gas is more related to coal gas or coke gas. Water gas was a process to develop pure hydrogen, and its process is far different than obtaining coke gas from wood. Possibly we need an article on water-gas itself. Magi Media 04:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)Magi MediaMagi Media 04:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

If you note there was no such separate article when I wikified the technical term, only a redirect from water gas (see oldid=31428511), you will see that the wood gas article equates the two, accurately or not. It was admittedly expedient to bypass the redirect article and I offer my effusive and heartfelt apologies for offending your sensibilities. As you have now created a separate water gas article, perhaps you would relish the opportunity to correct the link you impetuously deleted from Lowe's article, and make the necessary corrections in wood gas and review all of its incoming linkages for similar inaccuracies. "Avarice"? Sheesh. I don't get paid for this! ;-) Lupinelawyer 16:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Patent application/Patent prosecution articles

Hi. It seems to me that there is a bit of mess of patent law articles at the moment, with significant overlap between them. I'm having a go at improving things, and have started with the Patent application and Patent prosecution articles. I have created a (very) rough outline of what I think should be in each of the articles at Patent application/temp and Patent prosecution/temp articles, based upon the exising articles. I should be grateful for any comments, and even better editing, by yourself. As I said, they are only rough drafts that, at the very least, require signficant proof-reading before being done, but it seems like a good time to open out to a wider audience. Once these are done a number of the other patent law articles seem worthy of a significant rework to remove duplication. Kcordina ^Talk 12:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits to patent application. Nice work!--Nowa 18:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Aw, shucks, t'warn't nuthin'. Too wet t' plow ennyhow, but lupines are knee high. Lupinelawyer 12:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Still around?

You've been working quietly for a while... BD2412 T 02:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Apparently still here. Whazzup? Lupinelawyer 03:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Halligan bar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Halligan bar.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Sherool (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)