User talk:Lunchboxhero

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Lunchboxhero, welcome to Wikipedia.

I noticed your comment at Talk:Ferdinand Tönnies. You are right. I don't know what I was thinking when I took the links out. Thanks for putting them back in. I look forward to seeing your articles on them.

Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;

If you have any questions, see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. Angela 17:42, 9 Sep 2003 (EDT)

1 Critical theory vs. social theory
2 Gouti
3 Article Licensing
4 Community maps
5 Symbolwiki
6 Vegetable oils

[edit] Critical theory vs. social theory

Sorry, I'm not that informed about social theory. From what I read in you entry on the sociology page, it looked much like an entry about critical theory would look, so I thought that one was a subset of the other. Frankfurt school should be linked somewhere on the sociology page, maybe there is a better place. -- till we *) 17:34, Sep 13, 2003 (UTC)

[edit] Gouti

Thank you for bringing my attention to this. He's doing the same thing on the French Wikipedia too! w:fr:Special:Contributions/64.219.196.194. I have told them about it, and listed the page on VfD here.

I see you added Woodlawn to Chicago as a neighborhood. While there is a nearby town with that name, I don't think that there is a neighborhood by that name in the city itself. Also, the link you created leads to an ambiguous page. JMD 03:41, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)

wiki2pdf examples

% 

$ $money$ $ money 

~ ~tidled~/~/ ~~ ~ http://temp.com/~test 

# #number # number # 

_ under_score _ under _ score 

^ Car^at ^carat^ ^ ^ 

\ \backslah \ \\ backlash 

{ Brace} {brace {{ { brace 

} brace} }brace }} } brace

% 
$ $money$ $ money 
~ ~tidled~/~/ ~~ ~ 
# #number # number #
_ under_score _ under _ score
^ Car^at ^carat^ ^ ^
\ \backslah \ \\ backlash
{ Brace} {brace {{ { brace
} brace} }brace }} } brace

David Ley, The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
- [The most adequate analysis of gentrification I've seen Forest 21:18, 19 Nov 2003 (EST)]

[edit] Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

[edit] Community maps

Hi, I'm working on the image tagging project and I've come across a few map of yours like woodlawn.png, that have no copyright infomration. If you made them and want to put them in the public domain or licence them for use under the GFDL, could you please tag them with one of the following {{PD}} or {{GFDL}} , I've marked them as unverified for the time being. Thanks --nixie 01:24, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Symbolwiki

I noticed you had an edit on the symbolwiki article. The concept of symbolwiki is dear to my heart. Thankfully, such a symbol system already exists, though has very little internet presence thus far. However, it is not defunct, just no font. Check out Blissymbolics if you get a chance. --Mlandau 05:55, 14 May 2006 (UTC)