User talk:Lucille S

[edit] A welcome from Sango123

Hello, Lucille S, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
• Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Simplified Ruleset
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Wikipedia Glossary

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango123 (talk) 01:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

[edit] Private literature

You are right about the private literature, but we need to leave it to the Legal Department to deal with it, as they are experienced and qualified to handle it. The books clearly indicate that they are the property, not of the possessor, but of the Watch Tower Society (or something similar). - CobaltBlueTony 03:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the info Tony. I must say that i was more than a little surprised when i saw that you can download the entire "Organised to do Jehovah's will" and the "Pay Attention" books from the wikipedia page List of Jehovah's Witnesses literature. All of the other websites that i know of that had a version of the "Pay Attention" book that could be downloaded in its entirity seem to have been either shut down or have removed this option. Lucille S 03:16, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] JW template

This looks great. I suggest you move it over to the discussion of the template and everyone can voice their views on it there.

Great work! joshbuddy^talk 02:44, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] go ahead and replace it

It looks ready and good to me. Others will correct things that needs correcting, and discussion will ensue. It will be a good thing. joshbuddy^talk 04:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] JW controversies

I am very happy that this can be resolved. I admit to being a bit hardheaded at times. But I really believe that this is a controversial issue that should at least be touched upon. JW's may not be fully aware of how their views appear to others. Thanks. Cestusdei 04:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Lucy, I am satisfied with the way the article was changed to reflect this controversy. I don't want to pick a fight when the issue has been resolved. I think that in a way this debate shows why such a section was need in the article. It is a controversial issue. JW's and Catholics do not get along very well. That is a fact. I don't think it will change so long as we are regarded as the evil satanic whore of babylon. The JW's have changed their doctrines frequently. Maybe someday this one will go the way of the dodo also. One may hope.Cestusdei 01:18, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

But Catholics and JW's are so similar.. sigh. joshbuddy^talk 21:14, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Not sure if you have seen this, might be of interest to you... [1] BenC7 06:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

I have posted a RfC on the Controversies regarding Jehovah's Witnesses talk page. It would be appreciated if you would comment. BenC7 10:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Renames of pages

I saw go nuts with this. Go through all our JW related content, and do moves of it. joshbuddy^talk 21:14, 11 April 2006 (UTC)