User talk:Ltimur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] License tagging for Image:Ferryboat123.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ferryboat123.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Ferryboat123.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ferryboat123.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BrownCow • (how now?) 23:52, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ottoman Wiki!

Hello, Ltimur!

Browsing Wikipedia, I have seen that you speak Ottoman quite well. I want to ask you if you can log onto Metawiki and add you support to my proposal for an Ottoman Wikipedia here. I want users to add support for this Wiki, and I hope that if it becomes reality, Ottoman learners like you will help in it's development. Please add your support soon!--Fox Mccloud 15:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ferryboat123.JPG listed for deletion

[edit] Fenerbahce Stadı

Salak ingilize haddini bildirebilirsin

• 4-yıldız = 49.999 ve altı olan stadlara
• 5-yıldız = 50.000 ve üstü olan kapasiteli stadlara veriliyor. Kural böyle. 2008 UEFA finaline en az 4 yıldız şartı koşulduğuna göre ve Fenerbahçenin stadı en az 5 yıldız kapasite olduğuna göre bu bunun ispatı oluyor. İngilizcem az olduğu için açıklayamıyorum bu şerefi sana bırakıyorum ingilizi bir güzel g.t et. (Biraz kaba oldu ama kendi kaşındı)

[edit] Şimdide İnglizler Fenerin Logosunu Siliyor Yardım Edin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Fenerbahcelogo.png

[edit] Ottoman map

Please provide sources. Khoikhoi 05:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

I see the source, but 1683 is the darkest color. It clearly didn't have all of Egypt at that time, that's why Egypt is a lighter color (which represents an earlier year). Khoikhoi 00:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

No, keep guessing. Khoikhoi 01:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Photo

Lutfen o Maslak fotografini devamli koyup durmayin, zaten ustundeki fotograf ayni seyi ifade ediyor, iki tane ust uste gokdelen resimleri cok cirkin duruyor. Kesinlikle Turk ekonomisi ile ilgili baska birçok fotograf vardir, Istanbul'un gokdelenlerine iki foto koymak yanlis.. Ekonomi ile ilgili baska bir foto bul da onlari koyalim.. Baristarim 19:41, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Ulkenin genel zenginliklerinden bahsetmek kotu bir sey degil. Ama gokdelenler konusunda kesinlikle katiliyorum, ulkenin o imajini yansitmak çok iyi, yanliz benim tek demek istedigim sey, fotografin kotu veya yanli olusu degil, sadece formati. O fotografin ustunde zaten çok kaliteli gece çekilmis bir Levent gokdelen fotografi var, iki foto ustuste gelince biraz çirkin duruyor, tek demek istedigim oydu :) Yoksa benim o fotografla hiçbir sorunum yok, eger baska biryere ekleyebilirsek daha iyi olabilir. Mesela o fotografin yerine bir fabrika veya agir sanayi tesisinin resmi de koyulabilir. That's all :) Baristarim 00:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC)