User talk:Loveingsydney

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request.

Request reason: " accused unfairly of being a sockpuppet"

Decline reason: "Your apparently unprovoked attack against Snottygobble appears to indicate that you're a sockpuppet. -- Luna Santin 06:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)"

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request.

Request reason: " All that reveals is that I have read through the so called debate and correspondence between snottygobble, grant65, ambi and snottygobble's role as an administrater needs to be reviewed as I feel that he has alot of sockpuppets. I was only trying to help that user out. It was not unprovoked but from the miles long of corespondence and dodgy habits of snottygobble. I believe there is a conspiracy on there to shut up rl supporters."

Decline reason: "New editors don't start attacking others straight away and claims of "conspiracy" do not hold no hold much water with unblock review. --  Netsnipe  ►  11:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)"