User talk:Lostkiwi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello there, fell free to write me a few words and share what's on your mind.


Contents

[edit] Archives

I do like to keep things neat so will be mercilessly archiving this page

[edit] Lost

Nice to see another lost user. Maybe we can start a lost cult here:) -- Lost(talk) 07:04, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

A lost cult sounds great... as long as the Lost tv show people don't hijack it! -- Lost Kiwi(talk) 00:35, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Response

Do you think that's possible if you were called a LaRouchie, "appologist for fascist, Nazi's and anti-Semites, and accused of using anti-Zionist sources, when none of it were true, all is demonstrably false, and it all occurred in the midst of Arbitration? And the chairman has since admitted to errors in disallowing evidence to defend myself? Nobs02 02:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

You want to come back here screaming injustice and try to revisit issues from over a year ago, be my guest... just don't be surprised if you get quickly re-banned for being disruptive and useless to the encyclopedia which is the whole point of this place Lost Kiwi(talk) 02:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
limited review to a specific remedy and specific language; no punitive action against others.
I believe in forgive and forget. But its not possible to continue working having been made a target. Also, Mr. Bauder has graciously allowed me to begin this Appeal prior to the ban being lifted. I'd be happy to engage with you on anything, but for the next 10 days it should really be on user:Nobs02 talk page. Thank you. Nobs02 02:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
You are right, better move this discussion to your talkpage. Silly of me not to think about it. If the issue of you breaking ban by editing outside of the ArbCom or your talkpage comes up because of this, give me a shout and I will post some good words on the relevant page. Lost Kiwi(talk) 03:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] mediation/arbitration comment

If you don't mind, I've responded on my talk page, as it will be easier for me to keep track of that discussion there, since you have such an aggressive archival strategy on your own talk page (very Zen!). -- nae'blis 23:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nobs RfAr case

I read your comment and actually used it to explain better our position (I'm Nobs AMA advocate). Now I've clarified much better what our request is. Could you take a look on it? --Neigel von Teighen 13:19, 15 December 2006 (UTC)