Talk:Long March
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives
|
[edit] Distance Error
- The communists escaped in circling retreat to the north which ultimately covered some 8,000 kilometers (4960 mi.) over 370 days. The route branched through some of the most difficult terrain of western China and arrived 9600-km (5952 mi.) west, then north, to Shaanxi.
What shortcut let them travel 8000 km to reach a place 9600 km west, then north? I think there was an editing problem there. -- SEWilco 04:13, 20 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- I wasn't experimenting. I added information from the French version.
[edit] Eight Points of Attention
There is absolutely no mention of the eight points of attention in either the Long March or the Mao Zedong article; I find this pitiful mainly because it was such a vital factor that earned the CCP peasant support. The peasants were disillusioned with the KMT and their lack of concern for the peasants, whereas the CCP's policy of the eight points of attention earned them support otherwise impossible to gain (the peasants had become very cynical)....Yet there's no mention of it here! Surely someone should correct this discrepancy. -- Natalinasmpf 21:26, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Natalinasmpf; if you are so concerned about the error, why don't you add it yourself?
[edit] Introduction
The following phrase seems contradictory and the second sentence in particular is confusing. Could someone who knows more about this topic than I clear it up:
The communists escaped in circling retreat to the north, which ultimately covered some 8,000 km (4,960 miles) over 370 days. The route branched through some of the most difficult terrain of western China and arrived 9,600 km (5,952 miles) west, then north, to Shaanxi.
Thanks. Gerry Lynch 10:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
There are so many errors in the original post. Mao was not in the leader position when Long March started.
- I have tried to correct both of these problems. Ryanjo 02:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Epoch Times External link
There was an external link to a website named Epoch Times, which gives a highly opinionated version of the rise of the Chinese Communist party and other events, using inflammatory terms such as "Steadily Accumulating Wickedness" and "Hoodlums and Social Scum Form the Ranks of the CCP". Since links from Wikipedia to highly slanted sites are discouraged[1], I have deleted it. Ryanjo 15:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)