Talk:Living trust

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Can I put my lesiban partner as my leagal trustrie? Can a house be sold during the probate process, and if yes, does it impose any encumbrances for the buyer

  • I am not sure what a 'lesiban' partner is, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; not a law clinic. You should contact your attorney (and sign your comments). Legis 11:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

If the Successor Trustee has the trust document, and destroys it, what happens to the other beneficiaries who don't have copies?

[edit] Merge

  • If it is decided that this merge should take place, Living Trust is the one to retain, as it is by far the more commonly used term. However, there are numerous different specific types of trusts, each with its own peculiarities and regiments, that I vote to keep all of them separate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Triplewiki (talk • contribs) on 00:09, 3 November 2006.
  • I support the merger of living trust and inter vivos trust. Both are essentially revocable trusts. Moreover, "inter vivos" means living or more appropriately while living. I would support the relabeling of the merger as revocable trusts (aka living or intervivos trusts). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Samoan (talk • contribs) on 22:46, 7 November 2006.
Not quite sure what has happened here. Originally the second comment above was a dissent from the merger (check page history), and was posted by ananymous IP address User:66.194.72.10. On 08:06, 15 November 2006 the comment was edited by another anonymous IP address User:71.35.139.149 to change it to a support, and to change the unsigned tag signature to User:Samoan. It may all be the same person using different computers, but it all looks a great deal more suspicious than it needs to, except for the fact that it is a discussion on a proposed merge between two little read and little cited articles on Wikipedia, and no one really cares. Also curious, User:Samoan's first edit (check under contribs) pre-dates the merge tag, so you would have thought that if it really was his comment, he would have made the unsigned comment whilst logged on. All of which leads me to conclude, that it was User:Samoan who was behind the grassy knoll when JFK was shot.
Legis 08:58, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Nothing shady is going on here... I made the change. I not very Wiki saavy so I apologize. What I meant to say was that I disagree with the prior statement that Living Trust is the one to retain. Both Living Trust and Inter Vivos Trust are the same, but they both fall under the rubric of Revocable trusts. I agree though that there should be a merger.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../l/i/v/Talk%7ELiving_trust_644f.html"