Talk:Little Green Footballs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is a frequent source of heated debate. Please try to keep a cool head when commenting here.
This is a controversial topic, which may be under dispute.
Please read this talk page and discuss substantial changes here before making them.
Make sure you supply full citations when adding information to highly controversial articles.



/Archive01 July 2004 to September 2006

Contents

[edit] Talk page archived

I've WP:ARCHIVEd this talk page using the move option. Anyone wishing to continue a old discussion should copy-and-paste the wikitext of the relevant section of the old archive into this page (at the bottom of the page, I guess). Thanks, CWC(talk) 09:40, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV tag removed

User 68.43.135.155 (talk contribs) recently removed the Template:npov tag from this article. Is "the neutrality of this article" now beyond dispute? If a sufficient number of contributors dispute the article's neutrality, we probably should put the tag back. Comments, please? Thanks, CWC(talk) 06:34, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Name??

Why is it called "little green footballs"? Ive never gotten the name.AeomMai (talk contribs)

From the FAQ:
Q. Where does the name “little green footballs” come from?
A. Charles ain’t telling…
I don't know, either. --htom 21:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A million times better

GREAT job with the cites Chris, this entry is a million times better.

Dragula 17:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Redirects

I've just rewritten the text about redirects. Here's what we had before, including text recently added by user 71.163.15.57 (talk contribs) (shown in green):

When such confrontations trigger a stampede of visitors from hostile sites, Johnson sometimes redirects the traffic thus generated to the Israel Defense Forces homepage. An example of this redirect can be experienced by clicking any links from this site<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.drmenlo.com/lgfquiz/ |title=Redirection of anti-LGF site visitors}}</ref> to LGF.

I understood the original text to mean that Johnson would redirect traffic away during the "stampede" and cancel the redirection afterwards. But 71.163.15.57 is right: the redirections are permanent. (I did a little experiment using Wget and found that any request appearing to come from http://www.jewschool.com/ is redirected.) So I've replaced the text shown above with:

Johnson has configured his website to redirect visitors from some anti-LGF sites, including many of those listed below, to the Israel Defense Forces homepage.

If anyone has evidence of LGF using redirects as temporary anti-stampede measures, we'll need to undo my edit. Cheers, CWC(talk) 09:19, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] question about adding external links

what are the requirements for a link to be added under "pro" or "anti" column. Can they be any written article about LGF, or does it have to meet some sort of standards? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.117.120.41 (talk • contribs) 08:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC).