Talk:List of significant tort cases

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] What criteria?

A lot of these cases seem to be significant for first applying a particular doctrine of law (the kinds of cases that are in tort casebooks, Putney, Rylands, ect), but others are included just because they're famous? I can't tell. This list should have some NPOV criteria for inclusion, be made more comprehensive with that criteria, and everything else should be cut.

Essentually nothing links here anyway, so is there even a good reason to have this list? Would anyone be opposed to just turning this into a redirect to Tort, salvaging what little useful content there is in various tort articles? Cool Hand Luke 07:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)