Talk:List of neighborhoods in Kansas City, Missouri

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Kansas City, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the Kansas City Metropolitan Area. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of goals and tasks.


Contents

[edit] "Registered"

Errr, what's the source for this data? I ask because I work in the City's Neighborhood & Community Services Department, and we keep track of the registered neighborhoods. There's actually more like 150 of them, total... -- nae'blis (talk) 03:59, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes, Nae'blis, sadly this is an incomplete list. Being that you work for that department, you must have a list of all 150 neighborhoods. If you could complete the list that would be very helpful. Thanks a lot! 65.28.2.218 12:33, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, there's a couple of problems with that idea:
1) I don't know who this list is meant to be "registered" with. A lot of them are National Historic sites or similar, which is a more important grouping than our office's.
2) Our office gets new groups once or twice a month, at least, to add to our list. Many of them are not "notable" from Wikipedia's perspective, so it would difficult to justify my own decision to add/not add any particular new group; Wikipedia is supposed to be a collaborative effort, and I don't like the idea of being a gatekeeper in that manner. And our method of determining active groups is not published/public/particularly scientific...
3) The strange capitalization of this article makes me think perhaps it was copied from somewhere else, which is why I asked originally... maybe we need to start over from scratch, or move them to categories, or something.
-- nae'blis (talk) 22:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
First off I'm glad you created the list as a starting point. Now for the nitpiks:
1. I also don't like the "registered" or capitalization. This article should be called List of neighborhoods in Kansas City, Missouri. I would ***STRONGLY*** urge the renaming of the article (it's just a simple move).
2. If you have an official list floating around with 150 names or so, by all means replace what's here. Most of the neighborhoods don't have articles yet so you can't do much damage. Obviously you have to be careful to preserve the neighborhoods with articles.
3. Don't worry about gatekeeping.
Anyway, thanks for starting the list. It's a good start. Americasroof 20:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Actually, the name we choose for the article (and I agree the current one is poor) depends a great deal on how we define "neighborhood".

[edit] edit header

However not all of these are "notable". Maybe this'll give us something to start to discuss, however. Okay, so our list is more like 233 groups, today... -- nae'blis 21:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Those 233 aer our "Active" status groups, not brand new ones and not defunct ones, so it will necessarily differ from the list we currently have in the article. Another option is http://www.kcmo.org/planning.nsf/web/reports which lists those groups/areas for which an official "assessment" was done for the FOCUS project (this would be a subset of the 3rd list above). That might count as a "independent reliable source" (not sure), with the caveat that several neighborhoods were combined for size reasons into a single report, and some of the really large ones, like Ivanhoe, were split for the opposite reason. -- nae'blis 21:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] notable

Wow. Nifty little javascript. Didn't know about that one! I should be careful about what I asked for. The original list in the article looks pretty good in comparison. Your list is definitely helpful in making sure we catch the ones that are notable. In any event this list goes back to my argument that this article should be called List of neighborhoods in Kansas City, Missouri. The neighborhoods that I was most interested in that brought me here (18th and Vine, Quality Hill, Downtown) are not on this list. In most places neighborhoods are usually not defined by any government entity and so the free form list actually works. The registered part confuses things. Thanks again for the posting the list! Americasroof 21:35, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I think I saw Quality Hill floating around the other day. 18th & Vine definitely needs an article if it doesn't have one, though I'm not sure what name to put it under. Another possibility would be to limit the list to those with multiple instances of media coverage (Ivanhoe), historic district (Garment District?) status, or mentions in books (Westport, etc). Still rolling this around in my head... also, I notice there's precedent in Category:Neighborhoods in the United States that we could emulate, for further navigational aid. In no way do I think all 200+ on my list deserve inclusion. One question would be whether to include KS-side/suburban neighborhoods of special note (might keep us from proliferating sublists for Independence, NKC, Overland Park, etc). -- nae'blis 22:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
I think the list as is is good now. It catches everything that I might write to. If it doesn't, it can be created. Quality Hill and 18th and Vine are national register historic sites. Both have articles. It's the "registered" I don't like (and complaining about it was my main reason for wondering into this discussion). Registered implies government sanctioned, sponsorshipship and control. Neighborhoods are much more nebulous than that. So I still urge going to the neighborhood convention used in other cities List of neighborhoods in Kansas City, Missouri. Americasroof 22:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Oh, agreed. At this point I'm just wondering if a more nebulous List of neighborhoods in the Kansas City area would be more appropriate for a retitle. -- nae'blis 22:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
To see some of the naming conventions do a search on "List of neighborhoods" [1] This article shouldn't go down the slippery slope of trying to take on the entire metro area. The most notable neighborhoods are mostly south of the river. KCK has some notable neighborhoods but they should be in their own article. Likewise Overland Park neighborhoods could be in their own article. Offhand I can't think of notable neighborhoods in the other burbs except possibly in Independence. Americasroof 23:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Of note

Also, before doing anything major with this page I wanted to see the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medina neighborhoods - turns out it was no consensus, which gives work on this page a decent chance of surviving. I'll revise the page list a bit later, gotta work for now... -- nae'blis 16:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] registered list/map

Moved from the top of the page

Despite what Nae'blis says, I have seen several times a map - with list included - of all of Kansas City's registered neighborhoods. There is an official list. If you go to http://www.kcmo.org and click on "maps," it is possible to get the map to show the neighborhoods. Each one has a defined boundary. Several years ago, a "neighborhood improvement project" also had a fact sheet for each neighborhood. Perhaps Nae'blis has the ability to retrieve these, too. There are over 150 registered neighborhoods in Kansas City, Missouri - JUST Kansas City, Missouri, not the ENTIRE metro area. And yes, they ARE registered officially with the city and have official boundaries. That's all this list was supposed to be. Any further ideas??66.140.86.173 21:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

You're probably thinking of the FOCUS neighborhoods; they can be seen on a map at http://www.kcmo.org/kcmo.nsf/web/maps (requires Javascript, turn off popup blockers), and they do indeed cover 100% of the city, as that's what they were designed to do. However they're closely related to the census areas (see page 6 of http://www.kcmo.org/planning/pdf/focus/NA_reports/rochilmn.pdf and related documents), and don't always correspond to actual "neighborhoods". Some were combined, some were split, in order to get assessment areas of roughly the same dimensions. I can't find a public description of how these areas were decided, but you can spot-check how they differ from our 'registered' listing in dimensions, size, and coverage. But on the other hand, our office's listing includes some very small, new, and relatively unknown neighborhood associations. I'm not sure that's the same thing.
I think the above approach is best: abandon trying to cover/list 'registered' neighborhoods in Kansas City, and start focusing on the important ones. If we use a combination of a working list and a category, it should be relatively easy to navigate, and easy to add to. Further thoughts? -- nae'blis 21:47, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
The neighborhoods have defined boundaries. The boundaries are used on the city maps demarcating the neighborhoods. These boundaries are used widely by the city for a variety of reasons, as Nae'blis has admitted. How is this not "registered?" Each neighborhood in Kansas City has a border and a neighborhood association that corresponds to the neighborhood within that border. Nae'blis admits all this. The article should thus be left as is, except that ALL 150+ registered neighborhoods ought to be added. It's as simple as that. 65.28.2.218 00:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] groups v. neighborhoods

The list says "The City of Kansas City, Mo. boasts hundreds of registered neighborhood organizations. The type of neighborhood organization varies throughout the city. Most of the organizations fall into four categories: neighborhood associations, homeowners associations, block clubs, and service organizations." [2]

I have heard nothing from the group that covers my area in the seven years I've lived here. Either they are defunct or they are representing me without my knowledge. --Gbleem 22:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)