From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page was previously nominated for deletion. Consider the following prior discussions before re-nominating: Keep, VFD 18 Sep 2004 Keep, VFD, Dec 22, 2004 No consensus, AfD 26 March 2006 Keep, AfD 14 August 2006

This article has been cited as a source by a media organization. See the 2005 press source article for details. The citation is in: Cherre Stoneham (January 26, 2005). "Ex-weatherman slips the tongue.". Orion Online.

Previous discussion have been archived. Editors interested in improving this article are encouraged to see also Archive 1, Archive 2

Contents 1 Quarantine 2 Talk 2.1 Hick 2.2 Sand Nigger 2.3 Ginger 2.4 Coconut 2.5 Merging of Rosbeef / Rosbif 2.6 Dog Eater / Dog Muncher 2.7 My proposed removals 2.8 Hamburgers 2.9 Removing Lenny Kravitz "as an example" 2.10 Nigger Digger 2.11 Worldwide view? 2.12 It would be nice... 2.13 What is really wrong with this article 2.14 "Boat people" a slur? 2.15 addition requested - Pepper- 2.16 Chodeny 2.17 Trolling and personal attacks elided 2.18 Zhid/Yid 2.19 Twinkie 2.20 An important addition to this article 2.21 Porch Monkey 2.22 "Raisin" removed 2.23 Why is Spotted dick on the list? 2.24 "Tabernaco" removed 2.25 Goy 2.26 ???? 2.27 The Man 2.28 Alice-quoters? 2.29 925 2.30 Cleanup 2.31 Worst entry 2.32 Terms needing sources 2.33 How to revert the splitting 2.34 Jack Mormon 2.35 tiddly? 2.36 A suggestion 2.37 A Second Suggestion 2.38 Gweilo, gaijin, gringo 2.39 query 2.40 ethnic slurs are nothing compared to real racism 2.41 Alter kacker / alter kocker 2.42 Armenian Shower 2.43 Bible thumper 2.44 South Asian Slurs 2.45 Zipperhead / zip 2.46 A round of cleanup 2.47 Chink 2.48 Are religions ethnicities? 2.49 Das Ubergeigh 2.50 Preacher? 2.51 Undone revert 2.52 HELP NEEDED 2.53 New standards 2.54 Why is "wop" tagged? 2.55 Idea: full wiktionary integration 2.56 Poop

[edit] Quarantine

Please move here unreferenced terms removed from the article, with a suggested edit summary:

"Moved to [[Talk:List of ethnic slurs#Quarantine]]"

Please remove them from here once a reference is found. `'mikkanarxi 18:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Cotton picker 

a black person

prairie nigger 

A coastal American Indian (Native American).

White washed 

refers to non-white people who act like white people

[edit] Talk

[edit] Hick

Usually used to be offensive against people from the Appalachian area, particularly people from Kentucky. I know you suggested not using ones from particular states, but this one is considered really offensive (I'm from Kentucky, I know), and people use it without realizing. Also, Redneck is oftentimes considered offensive by people from the south.

None of those are ethnic in nature. L0b0t 21:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sand Nigger

This term is used in the film Three Kings

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.178.85.134 (talk) 04:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Ginger

As in "ginger kids", pale white people with freckles and red hair.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mwalle (talk • contribs) 05:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC).

Eh, I don't know where to post this, but the word coon comes from RAcoon. Or at least that's been my experience; in the south, you used to use dogs to hunt racoons, and so when they were used to "hunt" black people in the practice of "coon hunting", it came to meen a black person or a raccoon.

[edit] Coconut

Slang in New Zealand for a person of polynesian descent.

[edit] Merging of Rosbeef / Rosbif

I merged these entries (deleting Rosbeef and expanding on Rosbif) basically because it's redundant having both there when one will serve, and also because the explanation for "Rosbeef" was largely incorrect. It's not a large edit, but because this is such a controversial page I thought it needed adding here.--Capreolus 11:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dog Eater / Dog Muncher

(U.S.) someone of Filipino or Vietnamese descent. 'Dog Eater' also used against the Lakota for their practice of 'white dog feasts' (the white dog believed to be sacred) by whites, neighboring tribes, and even other Sioux tribes from the Dakota dialect who did not share this tradition/ritual. Generally considered quite offensive by the Lakota.

Doesn't it applies to Chinese and Korean, too? I saw on Travel Discovery Channel: a caucasian guy travel to Japan and eat exotic food. Such as, toad's moving heart, and etc. And for those who do not know, not all asian eat meat.--68.122.70.11 23:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

fyi, most of the racial slurs on this page are the result of stereotyping. if you don't know the definition/connotation of the word, look it up.138.27.1.2 17:43, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My proposed removals

In a few days (or less, if the page is no longer in protection) I'm going to start removing some of the more idiotic entries here:

• Terms that almost can't possibly refer to ethnic groups. This includes terms referring to tourists, jocks, cops, or similar.
• In most cases, people from a particular city (if no ethnic implication); I think it's safe to assume that in most cases residents of a city do not comprise an ethnic group
• People from a single US state when there is no clear ethnic implication to the "slur."
• This one's a bit more provisional: any term that refers to any non-ethnically-linked station in life, whether temporary or permanent. Taken to its fullest extent, this could include any term referring to poor people, rural people, or urban people, since none of those are necessarily linked to ethnicity. After all, the article claims to list ethnic slurs not derogatory slang terms.
• I'm from the US, so I'll mostly give a much wider berth to terms from other countries since I have no way of knowing whether the terms are much more ethnically linked than I realize. But I strongly encourage wise residents of other regions to delete stuff they are sure has no connotations of nationality, race, ethnicity, etc.
• Stuff that was once said in some movie or TV show, but never entered into popular usage.
• Maybe we should create a list of "items on this page I don't believe". Perhaps on a separate page. Each time you find a term you think has never been in use as an ethnic slur, you could add it to the list, and wait a few months. If nobody pipes in to say "I've heard this term in use," you should delete the entry from the main article.

I don't object to the existence of this article in principle, but it sucks horribly. It's full of crap entries, and a lot of the writing is just horrid. People are using it as a dumping ground for something they heard of once (or perhaps even thought of themselves) that once made them guffaw. There should really be a higher bar. My Alt Account 11:05, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

OK, I took out some stuff. Suggestion for further paring: stuff that was used in a movie/book/TV show, but doesn't seem to have currency outside of fandom. This article is still complete crap, of course. My Alt Account 18:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hamburgers

that's the name of the Americans (USA citizens) in Poland (sometimes)

"USA citizens" is not an ethnicity, so this term seems irrelevant to this article Bobbyi 15:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removing Lenny Kravitz "as an example"

"Jewgaboo (U.S.) a person of both Jewish and Black heritage" I don't think it encyclopedic to apply such ethnic slurs to actual people. I removed the reference to Lenny Kravitz "as an example" in that entry.Smiloid 03:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Good work! Following your example I removed a couple from "carpetbagger". Steve Dufour 02:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nigger Digger

'White' female who likes/loves a 'black' male

They tend to be referred to as BMW (Black Man's Willy/Woman)

[edit] Worldwide view?

What is the reason for this tag? Looking over the list it seems like much of the world is covered. Of course most of the words are only used in a limited area, and of course only the English language is covered. Should I go ahead and remove it? Steve Dufour 18:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

I will go ahead and remove it. I can see why a person might not like this article, but that is does not seem like a good reason to me. Steve Dufour 02:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC) p.s. I have the feeling that a lot of the contributions were put in *to* be offensive, not to report other people's offensive language.

I have a feeling your postscript is right on the money. Anyone who helps fix this problem will have my gratitude. My Alt Account 02:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

I have a feeling that the problem with this article will not be fixed until human nature itself is fixed. :-) Steve Dufour 03:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

This article would not EXIST if human nature was fixed. :P -- JoeB 12:20 PM EST, 16 November 2006

[edit] It would be nice...

...if the only people who could add a slur were members of the slurred group and had really had it said to them. Too bad that is not possible. Just a thought. Steve Dufour 04:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

(Personal attack removed) Where's beaner? That term is conspicuous in its absence. (Ghandi)

[edit] What is really wrong with this article

It's not that it's about slurs. Anything is worth learning about, even derogatory terms. However, can we monitor it so that people don't simply add a newly invented epithet or an arcane term or some endemic word only used in one region. There is no way to monitor this. It's just ridiculous that I can make up anything I want and put it in here and no one can check that for authenticity. This article unfortunately shows where Wikipedia fails as an encyclopedia.

Or maybe it doesn't...this article is more about defining word then giving the origin or common uses of the words; therefore it doesn't belong in an encylopedia but in a dictionary. Arthurian Legend 14:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

You'll find similar comments throughout this talk page and its archives. It's not true that "no one can check that for authenticity" - the edit page warning says "Please provide citations for all new additions, or they will be reverted", and every once in a while someone feels like enforcing it. Another never-ending debate is whether this should be a list of slurs or just ethnic slurs, so we spin our wheels a lot adding non-ethnic slurs and deleting them again. Art LaPella 20:15, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

I will go through and remove some of the worst.Steve Dufour 17:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

A lot of the words aren't really slurs and quite a few don't even relate to ethnicity. Its become "a list of words someone found interesting." I was editing the entry for farang and it occurred to me that as far as a dictionary definition is concerned, farang just the Thai word for "Caucasian." Of course, sometimes it feels like a slur. Asians are obsessively focused on race. It's farang all the time like you don't have a name, a job title, or any identity other than your race. "Is farang are a slur?" is a common questions newly arrived foreigners ask. I'd have say "no." But since there is a legitimate question, perhaps it deserves a place on the list all the same.Kauffner 10:23, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I mainly removed the American words since that is my culture. Foreign words I tended to leave since I didn't have much of an idea about them. Steve Dufour 01:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "Boat people" a slur?

I remember this used for the people escaping Viet Nam, etc. after it became communist. It was used with sympathy for them, not a slur. Has this changed? Steve Dufour 06:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Being from europe I recall this term used in news and media coverage to paint a graphic image of the hardship and the circumstances the refugees had to battle with.

[edit] addition requested - Pepper-

The opposite of a Bloke in Quebec is a Pepper: A derogatory term used to describe a French speaking Quebec born resident. Often times used against Quebec sovereignists (Bloc Quebecois), who have a history of prejudice and contempt for the Quebec English speaking population.

Absolutely ... the French Quebec separatists are compromised of bigots and socialists. Rumor has it in the Canadian press said Rene Levesque, founder of the bloc quebecois, made explicit comments on Jews and Black people behind closed doors. Define racism and Levesque will fit the definition. He lacks an experienced profile to get elected or serve public office. The movement has a racist viewpoint of Quebec is a white French society and lost its "purity" is totally pathetic. French Canadians don't need to abandon Canadian nationality and not second class citizens in chains or put into detention camps. No way in a million years that will happen, except when a bigot is in charge of a government. I pray that Levesque studied the consequences of extreme ethnic nationalism. Did he ever knew about the Nazis and the holocaust done to Jews? and how come a majority of Black Americans rejected racial militancy? America is a land of opportunity build on the foundation of assimilation, a tradition of integrated all races, and the US is a world model of a fair, free society. Blacks and Jews in North America fare better, than a "brother" in Central Africa, where real famine and oppression you won't see in the Harlem ghetto. and I sympathized on most Jews are spiritually tied to Israel, but America is very safe compared to the Middle east's terrorist threat. Anyway, most French Canadians speak enough English to get by in the business world that requires English proficiency, and what's obvious is Canada respected their very right of language because of Canada shared a democratic ethos. May I state over 3 million Franco-Canadians happen to live in the United States? Their identity and language is alive carried from one generation to the next. But I knew the "quebecois"' counterparts are very loyal to America and actually feel they belong to Canada, but chosen US citizenship, and not to the "Republique de Quebec" never gained ground. - Antonie S. , je suis une le Americaine.

[edit] Chodeny

That is incorrect spelling. Correct is chorni(Russian Чёрный). Literaly meaning is black. It's offensive term for Caucasusians (from Caucasus) such as Georgians, Chechenians, Armenians etc. However, it's not offensive when used for Black and African decent people.

[edit] Trolling and personal attacks elided

This text is a placeholder for some very long-winded trolling and name-calling that was severely cluttering the talk page. I don't believe anything productive took place in the entire exchange, but I didn't want to go so far as to delete the section.

If you want to see what I took out, it's right here. If we can all agree I'm not depriving us of any opportunity for conversation by redacting it, then this entire section (yes, this text right here) can just be deleted. My Alt Account 08:06, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Zhid/Yid

I searched zhid and this article came out. However, where is the meaning of the word? In Russian language it's a derigatory term for Jews. Can someone add it please? I'm a new user and cannot edit this article.--Glushak 10:01, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

• The problem there, I think, would be that zhid (or, properly, жид) is a Russian word, and this is the English Wikipedia. There is no question that it is a real ethnic slur, and would be very easy to document, but it simply isn't an ethnic slur in English--although its English equivalent, yid, probably should be on this list. I'm actually suprised that it isn't, particularly given some of the neologismic entries that this list has had. I'm not adding it myself because I assume that it must have been on this list in the past at some point, and was removed for some reason (I don't have time to sift through the entire edit history to check). If you want to add it ("yid" not "жид"/"zhid"), I certainly won't argue, however. And, incidentally, you should be able to edit the article unless you've been blocked for some reason. ergot 16:34, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

• The word YID is in this section, but I question whether it should be. Is 'Jewish' an ethnicity? Surely it is a religion and should be considered in the same way as slurs against Christians, Catholics, Muslims etc. The assumption that 'Muslim' and 'Jew' refer to ethnicity is racist enough in itself.

[edit] Twinkie

I just wanted to note that I did not find this in the list.

I'm not sure that this is a truely offensive slur or a widely used one, but a twinkie is yellow on the outside, white on the inside; i.e. of Chinese ethnicity but acts white or is white-cultured.

A former co-worker was a self-proclaimed "Twinkie" which I thought was funny, although I could see it as being deragatory.

--Twinkie refers to a gay man. I have really only heard it used as that & not as a Chinese "Uncle Tom".

--"twinkie" or "twink" is a term used to describe a young gay man. Perhaps your co-worker was communicating something else about himself other than ethnicity?

[edit] An important addition to this article

Chigger, Chinese Refers to Chinese people that try to act like Black people or are half Black.

http://gyral.blackshell.com/names.html

not a great source.

[edit] Porch Monkey

add porch monkey for those of you that havent heard this word or seen Clerks 2 it means a lazy black person, althought the point of its appearance in the movie is to change it from a racial slur to a word to describe any lazy person - Avenged Evanfold 05:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Do people say this in real life, not just in the movies? Steve Dufour 04:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes, people do say this in real life. I realize "some WP user agrees that he heard it somewhere" is a pretty pathetically low standard, but it is still a higher standard than has been observed by most editors of this article. My Alt Account 16:26, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

I guess it should stay then. I've never heard it, but then out here in California people don't spend much time sitting on their front porches.  :-) Steve Dufour 16:59, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

I think the connotation of the phrase is something like "unemployed welfare recipient," hence, sitting out front all day, watching the world go by. My Alt Account 00:45, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

never thought i'd ever have to explain this one... this slur was culled from the combination of 'porch' (where they sit and hang out) and 'monkey' (a common slur in reference to blacks) --138.27.1.2 18:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC) (aka Clown)

The discussion was about if the expression was used in real life, not what it means. Although I must say that monkeys look more like white people than like black people. Check this out next time you are at the zoo. Steve Dufour 02:51, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I was just reading this talk page and had to just comment on Dufour's "they look more like white people"....I'm laughing at this...but it's really not funny...are you blind, or just an apologist/idiot? User:Anon 03:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Well...very thin lips, nearly flat buttocks...and add that to the fact that we're the hairiest race, and I'd say that we DO look the most like monkeys, lol. 09:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Anon

[edit] "Raisin" removed

I removed "raisin" as a slur for black people since the cites don't seem to support the idea that it is used as a slur. The first cite[1] reported that Muhammad said: “You should listen to and obey your ruler even if he was an Ethiopian slave whose head looked like a raisin.” Although in today’s world it would be impolite to compare someone’s head to a raisin there is not reason to think that Muhammad meant this as a slur. The second cite [2] is from a Muslim discussion board where people talk about this saying. No one says that he or she had been ever called a “raisin.” The final outcome of the discussion is that Muhammad said this to address the prejudice that some Arabs might have had against blacks and it was not intended by him as a slur. Steve Dufour 04:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Why is Spotted dick on the list?

If you check out its article and the two outside links from there you will see that it is the name of a pudding served in the UK. There is no mention of the term being used as a slur for any group of people. Steve Dufour 23:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "Tabernaco" removed

It was supposed to be a slur used by Mexicans against French Canadians. I looked it up on Yahoo; it is found on a few French and Spanish language sites, very few; so it must mean something. However it only appeared on two or three English language sites and didn't seem to be a slur in English as far as I could tell. Since the list is supposed to be about words used by English speakers I went ahead and removed it. Steve Dufour 23:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Goy

I am not Jewish and I would not be at all offended to be called a "Goy". I understand that it means "of the nations", that is the non-Jewish world. I would consider that to be a statement of fact not a slur. Besides I understand that the nation of Israel has given out awards naming the recipient "Righteous Among the Nations". For instance Mr. Shindler of Shindler's List. If being "of the nations" is mentioned as an honor, how could it also be a slur? Steve Dufour 02:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

The main article on 'Goy' has it right, it can be used as a mild 'not one of us' term and I've heard it so used in Hebrew. --Hartley Patterson 22:32, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit]  ????

This 'list' serves no purpose other than to provide ammunition for those already holding racist views. Also, many of the terms related to Jews and African Americans are clearly fabricated by some racist individual(s) with too much time on their hands. Panda

I agree with you on many. Delete as many as you want, however you will be called names if you do. Steve Dufour 16:26, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Or else nominate the page for deletion. You have my vote. (However I would prefer to see the rules followed and the article remain since it does contain some good information.) Steve Dufour 21:42, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

I am going to slow down on my edits, I can't the only enforcer. Steve Dufour 04:05, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

I've been away, but I'll join you in enforcement. Per previous discussions, we might finally get around to splitting the article into sourced content and unsourced content, with the latter moved to a holding page out of the article space. There is no reason to have unsourced content in an article. -Will Beback 20:45, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

I will keep going then. I just took out a few in AB&C. Rather than having an uncited list we could just have a link to one of the sites elsewhere that lets in anything. Steve Dufour 01:20, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for hanging-in there. If we have a list that only contains sourced entries it will be easier to maintain. We just need to get there. The "unsourced list" would just be a holding bin for text so we don't have to delete it all outright. But it should be a talk page subsidiary, like a draft. (i.e. Talk:List of ethnic slurs/unsourced). There has long been a general consensus to pare down the list with one vocal exception, user:Primetime, who was later banned as an energetic and duplicitous plagiarizer. It's time to make the cut. Barring any fresh objections we should proceed promptly with previously announced plans to remove the unsourced entries. -Will Beback 07:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Man

Check out its own outstanding article. However I still don't think it is an ethnic slur. Steve Dufour 17:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alice-quoters?

Since when is Lewis Carrol fandom considered an ethnicity?

Please delete it then.  :-) Steve Dufour 00:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 925

I cut this out because the site it linked to said nothing about the person's race:

925 

(Southern California) a term for blacks, comes from the Los Angeles Police Department code for "Suspicious Person".^[1]

I think you are right. The link is only to a list of radio codes. Nothing about race at all. Steve Dufour 01:02, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup

This article became *HUGE* (192Kb) and requires cleanup and posible split.

For starters, I removed foreign-language ethnic slurs. If some of them have noticeable English usage, they may be put into a separate article. `'mikka (t) 18:35, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Good work. Thanks. Steve Dufour 00:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, thanks for doing that. For the time being, let me move the material from this page to Talk:List of ethnic slurs/removed entries. That can also hold the unsourced entries. -Will Beback 07:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Worst entry

It might be this one, twice removed and put back:

Bath toy A person from the Indian Ocean region, originating in 2004 after an earthquake caused a tsunami that killed over 250,000 people.

[edit] Terms needing sources

I've removed all of the unsourced terms, leaving those that linked to another page and some that seemed to indicate a source without a proper reference. Quite a few common terms were unsourced, and these might be a priority for sourcing: -Will Beback 09:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

• Wop
• Untouchable
• Sambo
• Redskin
• Potato eater
• Pig
• Mutt
• Mongrel
• Meatball
• Jap
• Argie
• Limey
• Frog
• Beaner

I've added some of these that had existing articles. There are more slurs listed in Category:Ethnic slurs which could also be added here on the strength of those articles. -Will Beback 23:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] How to revert the splitting

if anyone wants to stop will beback or anyone else from splitting the article, click on history, then the date of the version u want. the old version will display, so click edit, then save.

this is pretty pathetic. theyre deleting both unsourced + foreign slurs, so i guess that means all the slurs. i guess they dont give a shit about the keep results of those debates.Ymg55 09:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

It doesn't mean all the slurs. Those in English with some kind of source showing that they are used in the real world are welcome to stay. Steve Dufour 13:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jack Mormon

I think the article has improved a lot in the last couple of weeks. But is it true that "Jack Mormon" can refer to a non-Mormon as well as a person of Mormon birth who is no longer following Mormonism? That doesn't sound right to me. Steve Dufour 13:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Surely Mormons are a religious and not an ethnic group?

[edit] tiddly?

I added tiddly which is cockney rhyming slang for a Chinese meal, e.g tiddly-wink, chink. However, the word is also used as a derogatory term for the Chinese people. I have a link [3]

The link indicates that "tiddly wink" refers to Chinese cuisine, not to Chinese people. -Will Beback 19:25, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A suggestion

Perhaps this should be sorted by the group the word refers to, so it is easier to find a word to use in a specific situation. It is much harder this way.

You're looking for List of ethnic slurs by ethnicity. -Will Beback 20:29, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A Second Suggestion

Consider reverting this page back to an earlier version that is much more complete. The edits over the last couple months have totally butchered the list. For a topic such as this, it is unreasonable to require a citation as a prerequisite for word to be included in the list. See the following page for the list before it was destroyed: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_ethnic_slurs&oldid=55958195

Maybe the list should be elsewhere on the Internet. Steve Dufour 01:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gweilo, gaijin, gringo

I restored gweilo. I assume it was deleted because it is a Cantonese word. But English-speakers in Hong Kong use it. Of course, when an English-speaker uses it, it is not intended as a slur. It's the equivalent of gaijin for Japan and gringo for Mexico, i.e. they are words used by English-speakers who understand them to be slurs in another language. Both of those words remain on the list. (Actually, I think gaijin should be removed since it is standard Japanese and not normally a slur.) Kauffner 15:51, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

When I trimmed the foreign words out I left "gaijin" and "gringo" because they are used by English speakers. However if they are not used as slurs then they shuold be removed. -Will Beback 01:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

As someone who speaks Japanese and lives in Japan 4 months a year, I can assure you gaijin is not a slur, it is short for gaikokujin. The key issue is this, many Japanese do not like outsiders, but to call someone an outsider is not ment as a slur. Hope this helps.--Caligvla 02:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

LOL, sure, the word is formal enough, now, can you warrant main use is devoid of negative connotations? No slur to the Japanese, but they are ethnocentric enough that any term dealing with foreigners can hardly avoid being connoted negatively. --Svartalf 17:41, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

The negative connotations are only there because the person didn't do their homework. When a Japanese person says it they mean no ill will, if they wanted to disparage an outsider they would say "kichiku beihei" (dirty barbarian).--Caligvla 06:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

I Thought Gringo Was A White Boy And Gringa was white girl I'm not sure about the history of the word or watever but were im from Gringo Is A Word Used by Puerto Ricans/Latinos

Usually if you're "Cool With Them They Call You Gringo But Not Always A Ethinic Slur Just Like Out Here A Black Guy Might Call A White Guy Yo White Boy But It Might Not Always Be A Racial Slur"

I'm not exactly sure of the true meaning or history of the word. I guess it is just slang over here in Philadelphia.

I was told by a person from Latin America that he used the word "gringo" in protests against US military personnel in Latin America during times of governmental upheaval. He said that the US military wore green, so the Spanish-speaking protestors would yell "Green Go!" to make their protestations understood. He said that because of this the troops became known as gringos, and the term came to include any person from the US, especially pushy people.

Check out Gringo and Talk:Gringo.Skookum1 19:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] query

The "Mickey Mouse" entry lists it as "negro slang". Is that an oversight, or is some logic to using negro instead of black or African American? If there is a reason, it might be worth putting that in the list, since my first reaction was to change it to black. Natalie 03:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Some of these entries were copied from old slang dictionaries. I suspect that this is such a case. Since it's doubtful that it's used anymore, we might just drop the entry entirely. The listed source is for a non-ethnic usage. -Will Beback 20:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Makes sense to me. Natalie 20:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ethnic slurs are nothing compared to real racism

Look here people no matter what color or where you from. i dont like racism, ethnic slurs or name calling, but the P-C wackos dont have the right to come here and delete the whole page. i dont like hatred and prejudice as much like you do, and we need to focus on our society obsession with race. im 45 years old person and an american white man (note i said person and american first). i dont feel a racial minority 'deserves' extra treatment, nor a white male gets the privilege while nobody can have it. im not for affirmative action, but not for discrimination. i grew up listenin to ethnic/racial jokes and i may laugh at em cuz they are stupid and came from uneducated people. i knew jokes about my own race and religion, my nationality and gender, and i feel this is how i view myself, but no self-hate as i hold no hate onto others. time to send the P-c nonsense to the historic trash bin. its out of style, but after 40 or 50 years of civil rights and social change, have we in the US moved on beyond racism? today most people know better not to treat others who are different in a negative way to dehumanize them, like the page on racial slurs tries to educate on the power of words. and you know, words dont hurt me unlike racial segregation in public places has hurt millions of americans who happen to have dark skin. i detest it and glad to see that practice gone (as the law put an end to the practice once common in my childhood). i treat everyone equal: women in my job (its always rude and improper to talk sex or grab their bodies, before the feminist womens lib thing or the sex harassment laws came about), respect peoples different religions (im a christian taught to love and care for others ahead of myself) and dont feel those who cant hold a job or have money are 'lazy' (is it snobbery to look down on others not $150,000 a year like myself?). i dont shout jokes about blacks, jews and gay men (i hold differing opinions on homosexuality and same sex marriage, but never want to hurt or poke fun on others over their sexual preference, and tats not my business to know whos gay or lesbian, nor anyones' personal life at home). am i tolerant and consider all people as human beings? yes i do and im a republican who feels our society must advance away from stopidity on race, handicap, class and the like. we are the same inside no matter what and every one needs to compete, study, work hard, be responsible, be mature and be profesional at their career. are we all adults here? it seems some of you never learned by now. my 3 children in their teens dont hold hate in their hearts, and had friends (and dates) of different races. i dont really see that. i dont mind havin them around me, my wife & them. whoever thinks racist ideas on other people, i suggest they just don't like people. - signed: open-minded conservative

[edit] Alter kacker / alter kocker

Leck misch in d´r Täsch! Ich bin zwar kein Jüdisch-Experte, aber das scheint mir eine deutscher Ausdruck zu sein !--134.155.36.20 12:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

I think it says "My pocket leaks!" (probably means something like "Wow!") "I'm no Jewish expert at all, but that looks like a German expression to me!" Art LaPella 18:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Probably some Yiddish or dialectal variant of "Leck mich am Arsch!". (Lit. "Lick me in ass!", in meaning it's something like "Bite me!" or "Kiss my ass!".) No offense, but your translation would have a very strange word order for a German sentence. I guess the point is that "Kocker" is Yiddish, "Kacker" is german... 惑乱 分からん 03:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Armenian Shower

Is this the right article to list this term? For those of you who don't know, in the USA, Europe and Russia, the term "Armenian Shower", refers to an Armenian who had not bathed or showered, yet uses an excessive amount of perfume or other sented product to try to mask their body odor. The end result being an overpowering combination of offensive sents.

Usage, "Smells like s/he just took an Armenian Shower." "He was so depressed, he tried to commit suicide by inhaling next to an Armenian." - Woody Allen from Love and Death

In Armenian culture it is considered unhealthy to bathe more than once a week. --Softy Papa 03:22, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, this is the place. One use of the term appears on Google.[4] If we had a better source than a forum we could include it. -Will Beback 08:40, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Try searching on Alta Vista, Yahoo, etc. it's out there, or visit Glendale, CA. It's used 100s of times a day there.--Softy Papa 19:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

This might not be a derogative term against Armenian people, maybe it is an allusion to the so called "Armenian paper". These are small stripes of paper soaked in frankinscense, when the paper is lit, it smoulders slowly and the frankinscense is set free, covering bad odours. So the term "Armenian shower" might refer to someone who does not wash at all but rather cover up with lots of inscense and perfume (this has been common practice among europe throughout centuries when bathing was considered dangerous). The "Armenian paper" was made public by Frenchman Auguste Ponsots in 1885, who claimed he got the idea from Armenia, I do not know, whether this is true or was his marketing. The following link is an online shop in Germany and shows a wrap of "papier d'armenie". http://www.manufactum.de/product/755405/group/169069/dmc_mb3_search_pi1.pos/1/track_flash/0/Produktdetail.1773.0.html

[edit] Bible thumper

From the article:

Bible thumper

(U.S.) derogatory term used to describe an Evangelical Protestant, particularly one from a Pentecostal denomination, similar to ::Holy Roller, also commonly used universally against Christians. Alternatively known as Bible Basher.

1. Nothing here is "ethnic". Evangelical, Protestant, Pentecostal, Christian are all religious, not ethnic (hence two distinct attributes in discrimination laws). Why is the in an article on Ethnic Slurs? Who slid this one in? It really doesn't belong. Being Christian isn't an ethnicity by most standards (if any). Amish, Jewish, Muslim are exceptions to the rule since they often refer to people of a specific ethnic type (IIRC Amish are mainly of German decent). In that case it depends partially on the nature of the slur, rather than who it's about.

Bottom line: the slurs listed here should be ethnic, not religious, sexist, etc.

IN MY OPINION IT IS HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE TO EQUATE JEWISH FAITH WITH JEWISH ETHNICITY, THE LAST TIME THIS WAS DONE IN THE THIRD REICH. As being christian is not defined by ethnicity neither is being jewish nor being muslim. And to correct another factual error, the Amish are of Swiss decent.

[edit] South Asian Slurs

I did a little clean up on this section since some racists obviously want to make new slurs.

Paki is the only slur found offensive. PAK is an abbreviation's for Pakistan. Its not found offensive.

Desi's are mostly people from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Sri Lankans speak Tamil and are commonly not included as Desi's. If you have any questions then please ask instead of changing without knowing. I am from the region and would know about this.

Paki:-

Surely the word "Paki" should only be considered a slur (like any name/nickname) when it is used in a derogatory or negative manner?

By this twisted logic, does this mean if we call someone from Afghanistan an "Afghani" or someone from Uzbekistan an "Uzbeki" we are being racist?

"Stan" as in Pakistan means country or land does it not? So tell me, why is Paki offensive again? And why is it considered racist when not used by a "non south asian"? (So if an Indian calls a Pakistani a Paki its not racist or offensive but if say a white British person does its racist and deeply offensive?!?!?!)

Pathetic!

[edit] Zipperhead / zip

Derogatory term for any Asian but especially a person of Vietnamese nationality. I have never really understood what it meant but Google tells me it that it supposedly has to do with the way their heads would 'open up' when shot with a high-powered rifle; originally used by American soldiers during the Vietnam conflict. It doesn't seem to be as widespread as I had thought.

[edit] A round of cleanup

I've just completed a round of cleanup by moving quite a few entries into List of regional nicknames and List of religious slurs, which are clearly non-ethnic. It seems to me that now the list is fairly clean. I have two suggestions, though.

1. Please help fill in my new lists, since they are clearly incomplete. I myself added several out of my head (or, rather, from wikipedia). E.g., much more American states have nicknames for their dwellers, not only Okie and Hoosier.
2. I noticed that a significant part of this list is (quite naturally) terms for African Americans. I would suggest to split them out into a separate list. Comments?

`'mikkanarxi 00:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for doing that cleanup. I don't recommend splitting out certain ethnic groups. What would we call the remaining article? "List of ethnic slurs excluding African Americans"? -Will Beback · † · 04:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

No. but in the intro one may write "See List of ethnic slurs associated with people of African origin for ethnic slurs that refer to people of African descent". It is a very natural topic and not limited to African Americans. In fact there are three natural categories and IMO deserve separate articles:

• Slurs for Afroamericans
• Slurs for Jews
• Slurs for "white" people as used by "non-whites".

The usability of information increases when it is structured and categorized. `'mikkanarxi 19:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chink

There doesn't seem to be an entry for this term. E Batterschoom 12:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes there is. `'mikkanarxi 19:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Are religions ethnicities?

Some people claim they are, some claim they are not, and this also has a repercussion on the entries that are added/removed from the articles. Sure, even in a country where e.g. the population is mostly Christian, the most devote people will probably be object of ridicule or of pictoresque portrayal, there will even be special terms for mocking them , but would those qualify as ethnic slurs? EpiVictor 08:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

The current criteria for the list includes:

• For the purposes of this list, ethnicity can be defined by either race, nationality, region, religion, or socioeconomic class.

While I see some benefit to changing this, I also see even more problems. The boundaries of between religion/race/ethnicity/class are fluid and even more so in the field of slurs and slang. Are slurs against Jews religious or ethnic? Are hillbillies a class, a racial group, or an ethnicity? Are Americans an ethnic group? Instead of removing the criteria perhaps we should incorporate broaden the article title: "List of ethnic and religious slurs". -Will Beback · † · 09:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I've been taught that religion is a component of ethnicity, IE an Iraqi Shiite and an Iraqi Sunni are of differant ethnicities simply due to the fact they belong to differant sects. I say to include religion. Kyle Stingily 27 November 2006

So, is Janet Reno a racist towards Branch Davidians? Is Scientology now a race? I say disambiguate it to religious and ethnic slurs. Calling religions races is nothing more than a ploy by their members to become immune to criticism. Jews are a special case though. There is a distinct and pronounced Jewish race, where as there is no Scientologist race, no Muslim race, no Christian race. Lord Patrick 21:33, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Das Ubergeigh

I removed this example from the list. If someone feels that it should be returned to the list, there should be an appropriate explanation for what the term means, instead of the non neutral comment that was written formerly. 68.191.41.61 07:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Preacher?

This definition does not apply it to any particular ethnicity. Suggest breaking it into sub-definitions , or deleting.

[edit] Undone revert

Peatbog Sergeant (talk • contribs) reverted the article back to a version before our big cleanup.[5] Unfortunately I didn't notice it for a couple of days.[6] Peatbog is possibly a sock of a banned editor who's done this kind of thing before, so it may happen again. -Will Beback · † · 06:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] HELP NEEDED

I've just trashed the whole old List of ethnic slurs by ethnicity which was 100% unreferenced (actually moved it to List of ethnic slurs by ethnicity/old) and started importing verifiable content from here. Please spare a minute or two to help me here. `'mikkanarxi 03:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

While doing this, I noticed that the List of ethnic slurs used the word "Asian" indiscriminately, even when from the context it is clear that some term is related to, e.g., Chinese (i.e., East Asian). Please review the article and narrow down to East Asian/South Asian/Middle Eastern/Central Asian/Russian (the last is a joke, haha only serious, to show the point). `'mikkanarxi 03:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

And by the way isn't it so that "Asian" itself is an ethnic slur. Some Chinese colleagues told me so. `'mikkanarxi 03:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New standards

Will Beback and I have agreed to set standards for exactly what slurs belong in this article. If there is a consensus for these standards, I will help enforce them by deleting entries that don't conform to those standards. If there is a consensus for a different set of standards, I will help enforce that too - I'm proposing these standards mainly so we have something definite to consider, not because I really want to debate their details. But if there is no consensus, then I will continue to let the rest of you re-add and re-delete the same entries over and over and over again - I wouldn't get any satisfaction that way.

1. The current incarnation of List of ethnic slurs is over 90% ethnic, so let's make that part of the standard. I think slurs like "towelhead" refer to a religious requirement rather than an ethnicity, so they should go. Jews should stay as they are both an ethnic group and a religion. Non-ethnic slurs could be moved to places like List of religious slurs.

2. Citations are required. Let's say a wikilink to an article about a slur is a good substitute, if that article has a citation and refers to the ethnic slur sense of the word (unlike banana for instance - or if we disambiguate to banana (person) then there's no citation).

3. Foreign slurs should be included (or systematically excluded). I think including them is the more obvious standard - the fact that this is English Wikipedia means to me that the definitions should be in English, not that we shouldn't have an article on Des Moines or on the Arc de Triomphe for instance, linking to another article on the Place de l'Étoile with several French words. English Wikipedia's goal of explaining the universe to those who speak English isn't served by removing any information with a foreign name.

4. It's not a standard unless everybody knows, and everybody doesn't know without advertising the rules in detail. The rules above, or their revised version, should either be on the edit page 27 times like the existing edit page warning, or else that warning could refer to a more complete text of the rules elsewhere, such as at the beginning of this talk page as at Talk:Big Bang. I'll be happy to write it if I know what to write that the rest of you would support.

5. The new standards would start by deleting all non-conforming entries. In the A's, B's and C's only, non-conforming entries currently include Argie, Banana, Beaner, Bloke, Bong, Brown Sahib, Canto, Chechaco, Chigger, Coconut, Colored, Coloured, and Coonass. Of course many of these are well-known slurs, but if those aren't the rules then we should stop saying they are the rules when deleting, or we won't ever get anything done except re-adding and re-deleting. That argues for using something like #Quarantine above.

Art LaPella 08:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

That all sounds good to me. If there's a sourced article about the term we might think of adding the source here too. Otherwise I agree with everything. -Will Beback · † · 18:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Why is "wop" tagged?

I was just wondering why a word so familiar as "wop" has a ^{[citation needed]} -tag. What is the citation supposed to support? That such a word exists and that it has the meaning described? But this is well-known. My Oxford English Reference dictionary lists it as, I believe, do most good dictionaries. Its etymology is given at www.etymonline.com. What remains in doubt? garik 18:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

You can tell from my name that I know what wops and dagos are, but if we adopt the standards in the previous paragraph, words like "wop" do indeed need citations to stay here, rather than make exceptions for citations that are easy to find. Exceptions are what feeds the cycle of deletion and re-adding. The citations you described sound good to me. Art LaPella 19:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough. It suppose it does help avoid conflict if such exceptions are avoided. Anyway, I've taken the easy route and used Dictionary.com, which is used elsewhere here. garik 20:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, colleague. A no-go. dictionary.com is not a valid reference: they are mere aggregators of what theuy grab on 'net. `'mikkanarxi 05:43, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

The origin of the term "wop" is often said to derive from "with out papers" but this is mistaken. The term "wop" is derived from the Italian word "guappo", meaning a swaggerer, pimp, or ruffian. Here is a relatively decent reference that describes both the mistaken origin and the actual origin: [7]. Can someone update the article to reflect this correction? --70.51.230.254 15:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Also if that reference isn't good enough, here is the American Heritage dictionary's definition [8]:

NOUN: Offensive Slang Used as a disparaging term for a person of Italian birth or descent.

ETYMOLOGY: Italian dialectal guappo, thug, from Spanish guapo, handsome, dashing, braggart, bully, from French dialectal wape, rogue, from Latin vappa, flat wine, scoundrel.

HTH. --70.51.230.254 15:07, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Idea: full wiktionary integration

Wiktionary is the right place for these words to be defined, not Wikipedia, although I can see a little value in having this full listing of them here as this article does. As such, I would recommend that going forward Wiktionary entries be created for each term and than each word listed be linked to its wiktionary entry. This makes it clear that most terms do not require their own articles here, just quick dictionary definitions. I also note that a large portion of these words are defined in standard dictionaries such as American Heritage and OED, thus that media is already established formally as an appropriate medium for defining these terms. --70.51.230.254 15:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Poop

Someone ought correct today's revision of the list... items #-A-F are currently gathered under the headline of "POOP".