Talk:List of characters in the Harry Potter books
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Magical Beasts
Do Firenze and Grawp really belong here, or elsewhere? Rosemary Amey 00:08, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- I think so, but Buckbeak, Croakshanks, Scabbers etc. belong somewhere else. Of course, Firenze doesn't even really have a page, so someone probably should add one at some point.
[edit] Armando Dippet
Content originally contributed by user:Jcsutton in a different article which has since been nominated for deletion. This notice preserves GFDL attribution.
[edit] Missing sorting hat names?
I just added some sorting hat names from books 4 and 5, but I haven't been able to check the first three books for missing names here. Someone please check those books for such characters that may only be mentioned briefly.
[edit] Are wizards such as Fred and George Weasly still considered students?
The sub-category "Older Gryffindors" should be rearranged.
- They were students for most of the series. This list should reflect all the books, not just the current situation after book 6.
[edit] "Elfs" or "Elves"?
Isn't the plural of "elf" "elves"?
- Thanks for the correction, I wasn't paying much attention
-
- Either is considered to be correct.
[edit] Alphabetical Order
I know that not many people now edit this page anymore but I am posting this message anyways. We should list this page alphabetically instead of by groups. This can solve a problem of "overlapping" where a character appear more than once. We could start a temporary page Alphabetical list of characters in the Harry Potter series so we needn't erase this page. --Mozart2005 15:29, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- That's a good idea. -- Alex Nisnevich (talk) 16:23, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
-
- How about we split off the group lists to their own articles? "List of Death Eaters" &etc. --Maru 19:54, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Defence Against the Dark Arts Teachers
Year 6: Severus Snape – Fled Hogwarts after killing Dumbledore. Since this is a pretty big spoiler for the series, can we edit this down a bit? The other years, I think, are fine but seeing as book six just came out it seems more of an issue. Thoughts? --Toddbloom7 21:21, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Voldemort
Do we have a canon precedent for referring to Voldemort as a Death Eater? Njál 01:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- I do not beleive that Voldemort is ever mentioned as being a Death Eater, just that they follow him. --Jhfireboy I'm listening 11:19, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- How about listing Voldemort under "Dark Lords"?
[edit] Film character
Should characters introduced in the films be listed here? They aren't really canon, are they? --Damsleth 08:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- No, they're not canon. This is a list of characters in the Harry Potter books. The boy in PoA is named Bem, and he and Nigel from GoF are not in the books. They're probably kids who won a part in the movie or something. I'm going to take them out. -Fbv65edel 22:54, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Non-canon
I do not think we should have the list of characters only mentioned by JKR. It is like Damsleth a list of characters in the Harry Potter books. - Jonathan235
[edit] Muggles
Do we know if all of the so-called "Muggles" are actually muggles? From my knowledge of the books, it doesn't say that they are non-magical.
[edit] Duplicate name
Patricia Stimpson is mentioned both under "Gryffindors" and under "House Unknown". Which is correct?
[edit] Table?
While the table of the students is a nice touch, that many images will make the page HUGE and difficult to navigate. I think we have to discuss this here before proceeding. We don't need notes about a character. We just want to find characters, and get to main articles about them, if any. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 02:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
I got a bit caught up, so it appears Treebark did it for me, but I reverted all of Jhfireboy's edits as per the comments I left here. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 03:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
I just thought it would just make the page be more accessable in alphabetical and not in categories as I find them a bit confusing. If anybody would like to see a taster of the table look here. Also I would like to comment that I think the notes would just make it easier to place people in the books as some are only mentioned once and I do not know where they are and in what book. Jhfireboy I'm listening 15:33, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- It would probably help to have notes just for the minor, minor characters, as you say. No offense, but I think the table makes it look cluttered. If somebody is looking for a last name, and they don't know which category it would fall under, they can just search the page (Apple+F/Ctrl+F). But this way, it organizes characters by importance and category, which is more essential when linking to the page. Just my two knuts… --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 17:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- Good point, I see where you are coming from and why that would hapen as it does. Also to add to my points above some names are mentioned in more than one area and I thought that we are trying to get a complete list of characters without duplicates and in alphabetical order this is possible. -- Jhfireboy I'm listening 11:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Well, if you search the page like I mentioned, you could find out the different categories your character falls under. But I understand the need to get one mention of characters with multiple categories listed. Still, I think this is the most convenient and neat way to list them. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 14:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
-
Hello. I read on the Harry Potter Portal that one of the "things to do" is to tabulate the people on this page. I had a quick go with the students at the top of the list. I think the tables are better than the lists as you can more clearly see how people are related to Harry age-wise. I'm quite new to all this wiki-ing so I'm not convinced the tables are the best they can be. If you can make them prettier to look at then feel free Kelly elf 16:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
EDIT: I just read the rest of this talk page and I see that there is already a table thing in progress. If you want to revert my tables and stick to the one suggested above then ok Kelly elf 16:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Kelly elf, I'm surprised to see that on the To do list on the portal, because that's a major change for which no consensus was ever reached. As you can see above, jhfireboy was interested in tabulating it, while I thought it would look cluttered. I would strongly suggest that this be talked about a lot before anything continues to be done. I would bring it to the WikiProject, but, despite the number of members there, it seems pretty dead. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 23:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Middle names
Is there a reason why the trio's middle names are included? 65.92.204.139 03:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)