Talk:List of Prime Ministers of Canada
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
List of Prime Ministers of Canada is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you see a way this page can be updated or improved without compromising previous work, feel free to contribute. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
 FA |
This article has been rated as FA-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as high-importance for this Project's importance scale. |
| List | This article is a List. |
 |
This list is part of the Government of Canada WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Government of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
Contents |
[edit] A lovely timeline
I have made a meta:EasyTimeline for this. It is based on the Template:Timeline US Presidents 2. It is here now here, and dont mind the unrelated stuff at the top. Any comments? is it useful? Any errors?- Lucky13pjn 04:55, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
- I have added it to Prime Minister of Canada instead. - Lucky13pjn 20:24, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
is it too early to add harper?
- I don't think so, now that he's won the election. the table will have to be completed later though, to get the dates right mylesmalley 05:59, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Why is Harper's row taller than the others? I think it is because of the image of him, but I don't know how to fix it. -Arctic.gnome
Corrected. I'd also reccomend that after the "hand off", Mackenzie-King be put in the little bottom one as the "longest served".Habsfannova 01:13, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- I had actualy just added King before I read your comment about it. Weird. -Arctic.gnome 05:44, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Harper image
I kind of liked the old image of Harper better (With the blue background after it was made to fit in the square). Anyone agree? -Arctic.gnome 08:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] born/died/burial columns
While it is clear that a lot of work was put into adding these new columns, I think that it makes the list look a bit messy. Furthermore, I don’t think that information is needed in a general list, if people are interested they can look at lists like List of Canadian Prime Ministers by place of birth. --Arctic Gnome 16:46, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed, I don't care much for those columns either.--Kalsermar 16:28, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Harper and Martin images
I've replaced the images for Harper and Martin with ones used previously. (Image:Paul Martin04small.jpg → Image:Paulmartin.jpg, Image:Harper2.JPG → Image:Stephen Harper head 2.jpg) My reasoning: the old ones looked terrible. Martin's was lo-res, and it made him look really bad, and Harpers looked out of focus. Check out the old version and see for yourself. You have to remember that when you render images to a different size, their appearance can change, as was the case in the old version. You should use the show preview button before you save your changes, and go over what you've done to make sure it turned out properly. I don't believe that these are the best images available, but they are certainly better from what they were. If I come across better ones, I will upload them, and I encourage other to do so as well. --Reaper X 19:33, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- I already know how to use the show preview button and think the low-res image of Martin was better than the one you put up. In that one his mouth is half open and he looks like an idiot, and least the low res one was somewhat professional. --Arctic Gnome 14:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
What are you talking about?! He looks like hes making a face. The low res by itself looks good I agree, but when its stretched to fit this list it looks terrible! --Reaper X 19:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Don't the offices of MPs have an official photo that they put into the public domain? --Arctic Gnome 04:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
They do have official photos at the Members of Parliament site, but are not public domain, rather they are under the Copyright Act of Canada. --Reaper X 18:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Those photos I just mentioned can be uploaded to Wikipedia using the {{Canada-politician-photo}} licence, I will do so now, and put them on the list. --Reaper X 18:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- That may not work. This is a featured article and thus has to obey the Wikipedia rule that you use a free image over a copyrighted whenever possible. --Arctic Gnome 05:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Claims to Fame
Great page folks. The very first questions on our mind when reading it were "What were their claims to fame" and/or what was the geopolitical situation during their term. You've touched on that at the bottom for a few of them, I think it might be nice to have a few on-liners for each of the others (it can link into their own page, or to other details pages). I'm about to do a hack job of it as an example, because i'm actually here to learn about the history, but please feel free to fix it up if you find it a good idea. If it turns out that, like the 'dates' above it's not of general interest and/or makes it too cluttered, perhaps you'd do me a favour and copy the content to a page named something like "List Of Prime Ministers Of Canada With Their Key Contributions" Jethero 01:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- At first I supported that idea, but after thinking about it some more, I feel that this now column would make the list a bit too cluttered and it would be POV to pick which events are most important. You should take the work you've done so far and create a new article called List of Prime Ministers of Canada by main contributions and link it to the bottom of this page. That list wouldn't be in a table and you could have a lot more room to work with. --Arctic Gnome 17:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Designated vs Party Leader
I like having two different terms for PMs who were appointed by the GG and those who just won the leadership of their party; but can anyone think of a way of replacing the noun phrase "Party Leader" with a verb phrase that doesn't take up too many words? --Arctic Gnome 17:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Two Lost weeks
When Macdonald and Abbot died, there were vacancies lasting about two weeks. Who was running the country? Shouldn't they be included? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.108.2.161 (talk • contribs).
- No one had the title of Prime Minister during that time; the Crown would have spent those two weeks trying to find someone who could gain the confidence of the legislature. I doubt that much got done in terms of ruling the country during those two weeks, but I guess the privy council would have been in charge as a group. --Arctic Gnome 05:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
