Talk:List of Current NFL franchise post-season droughts
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Vikings
I am a Kansas City Chiefs fan, so this is a slight suprise, but the Vikings have an error on this page. You have them as never winning a championship and then have (Founded 1961). They won the NFL championship once, in 1969. The merger took effect in 1970, so the AFL champion Chiefs were playing the NFL Champion Vikings.
[edit] Browns
Along that line (Vikings) the Browns lost the 68 and 69 NFL title games to the Colts and Vikings Smith03 18:44, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
I think the title of this page should be shortened, the current title is too long and this pag, along with the other 2 similr pages regarding NBA and MLB do not appear in any searches unless you type in the entire page heading. lawnboy1977 13:27, December 2, 2005
[edit] Merge
Apparently somebody posted the merge tag on here. Well, I oppose. National Football League is already too long as it is; it is over the preferable article size. Also, among the content that was previously on that page but was moved to seperate articles were NFL lore [1] and NFL on television [2] Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:35, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
- Yes it NFL needs splitting, but not by just creating this ugly titled sub page. THe whole artivle needs splitting up somehow--Light current 15:47, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
- If you think this article is "ugly titled", then perhaps you should be thinking about a a page move/rename, or perhaps spliting this page itself, rather than a merge. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:56, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
- I see nothing wrong with the title of this article, nor do I think that this article should be split up. I find it useful to have all this info on one page. Kingturtle 18:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- On the subject of splitting the page, I do not think it is necessary, however, I do think the page should be linked to other pages on this site. Maybe linked to the Super Bowl page, or the NFL main page. lawnboy1977 68.110.72.4 18:38, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Tables
I think these lists rather lend themselves to being tables. Any objections? —Wrathchild (talk) 19:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- just make 'em pretty. Kingturtle 21:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC) :)