List of significant tort cases

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Palsgraf v. Long Island Rail Road Co.: Important case for discussion of proximate cause. Court of Appeals of New York. 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99. (1928)

Fletcher v. Rylands: Early leading case on strict liability doctrine. (Exchequer Chamber, 1866) L.R. 1. Ex. 265.

United States v. Carroll Towing Co.: In his opinion, Judge Learned Hand gave his famous formula for determining the appropriate standard of care to be expected in given circumstances. P = probability of mishap, L = loss that would result from such a mishap, and B = the burden of adequate safeguards against the possible mishap. In Judge Hand's formulation, liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P (viz., whether B < P*L). U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit. 159 F.2d 169.

Vosburg v. Putney, 50 N.W. 403 (Wis.1891): A leading case of the Eggshell skull rule. A boy with a pre-existing leg injury is kicked in his shin, causing serious damages.

Vaughan v. Menlove, 132 Eng. Rep.490 (C.P. 1837): An important case in the definition of a reasonable person standard in which a man negligently stacks hay that catches fire

Donoghue v. Stevenson: A formative House of Lords case.

McDonald's coffee case: An American court case that became a cause célèbre for advocates of tort reform. An 81-year old woman received 3rd degree burns from spilled coffee purchased from the restaurant chain and sued to recover her costs. The jury found the conduct of McDonald's so objectionable that they awarded the woman millions of dollars in punitive damages (above and beyond compensating her for medical expenses, etc.). Many casual observers considered this excessive. The punitive damages were later significantly reduced by a judge on appeal, though this fact is not as widely known as the jury's initial decision.

Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 551 P.2d 334 (Cal. 1976): A case in which a patient told his psychiatrist that he had thoughts of killing a girl. Later he did kill the girl. A leading case in defining the standard of the duty of care, and the duty to warn.