Category talk:Lists of lists

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"lists of lists"?!? Is that all? Maybe we need "lists of lists of lists". I think that the user will be confused. Can be just get rid of this? -- Fplay 08:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

• • Why get rid of it? Let someone do a search and put them all in.Ortho 04:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Suggestion to merge in Structured Lists

I've been trying to figure out what a Structured List was supposed to be. If no one steps up with a better definition I have no problem with merging them. --JeffW 04:08, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

What page are you referring to? Could you maybe provide a link? I couldn't find it. 68.162.31.68 18:57, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Category:Structured lists was deleted a few weeks ago. --JeffW 21:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Self-categorization

I contend that this is a reasonable category to be self-referencing. As per Wikipedia:Categorization: "However, acceptable loops also exist. Self-referencing systems such as the meta- fields naturally create cycles that provide many examples." This category is obviously a list whose members are also lists, and therefore falls under the category of lists of lists, which happens to be itself. -Heartofgoldfish 07:35, 21 October 2006 (UTC)