From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Old User talk

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, LexCorp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Hi, welcome. The more the merrier on these {{Creationism}} pages... Alai 16:59, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. I hope I can contribute to some pages but I won't be able to keep constant guard. First because the time it takes and secondly because it truly depress me to argue with irrational people like the creationist. Having said that I fully support your effort and that of the rest to keep the wikipedia as factual as possible, especially regarding to the distinction of scientific methodology vs irrational thinking (Which is very legit as long as it doesn't cross the line to rational thinking areas). --LexCorp 19:11, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cesare Emiliani

You may find this article interesting. It gives an adbridge Bio of Cesare. askewmind 12:13, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Feynman Lectures

Good edit! Looking back, I do remember it being called that now, and the addition of chapter topics is a useful addition. Now it just needs to be linked to the appropriate articles... Eric Herboso 01:54, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Update: Never mind -- you already took care of it. (c: Guess my browser was using a cached copy, and I didn't notice till now. (c; Eric Herboso 01:56, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] scientist re-stubbing

I'm trying to help you re-stubb all scientics at wikipedia. Askewmind 01:18, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)

See your Talk page. --LexCorp 01:51, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Created kinds edit

Now that we have Creation biology up and running, would you help out with Created kinds? It really helps to have a third person in these edit processes with User:Ungtss.

Thanks,

Joshuaschroeder 01:29, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I will try but I must warm you that I am about to change home and they are gonna cut my internet connection anytime now. So if I drop out of the scene you know what happened. It may take a long month to get connected in the new place.--LexCorp 01:47, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Creation science

Ummm the way the vote is going at the moment, I don't think even a change of vote to merge will do anything. Megan1967 09:40, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Yep, I am becoming more dissatisfied and disenchanted with the wikipedia project by the day. I do believe on the concept of a free unbias encyclopedia. But it is now my believe that the current policies and their aplications prevent that from been a real objective. A pity really. Futher more I have been recently reverted quite rudely for pointing out a possible flaw in the wikipedia. Episodes like that one do not help at all. A project that do not consider the criticism from its own users is not good at all.--LexCorp 09:56, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I've changed my vote to merge but the keeps still look like they're in front. It probably end up "no concensus" at best. Megan1967 11:34, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Current User talk

[edit] Large Hadron Collider is Science Collaboration of the Week

You voted for Gene and this article is now the current Science Collaboration of the Week! Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia science article.

Samsara (talk • contribs) 11:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Intelligent Design Talk

Could you please go here and give your opinion on my proposed change to the intelligent design article. Thanks! Bagginator 10:49, 1 October 2006 (UTC)