User talk:Leuko/Archive July 2006
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Ah, the mysterious 72.228.3.244. Thank you for registering and hashing this out with me. I want to make Wikipedia a better place, not an ugly mess. I am sure that you can understand that anon users just can't be taken at face value since they are mostly likely just trying to cause trouble. Spike 17:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Either way, the same thing. :-) Alpha characters look better than numeric IP's, I guess..
- It is more or less the same thing, but using a big ISP, anyone could be using that IP address in a few days. Having a registered user shows you are dedicated to working on here and making it a success. Spike 18:01, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
3rr
You have broken WP:3RR (counting previous anon edits) at St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine. Please don't do this again or you will be blocked William M. Connolley 18:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, I wasn't aware of the policy, and just did it to present factually correct, and verifiable information. How may I add this back in, or dispute the fact that it's not there? Leuko 18:46, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
We have to wait out the 24 hours and watch ourselves for the future. There isn't much that can be done. We also can't log out and do an anon edit since the IP is linked in logs to our registered users, and it's also a violation of the Sock Puppet Rule, which will get you banned but good. Spike 18:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like someone managed to anyways. Leuko 22:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
There are many more people than just you and I involved in this. Spike 00:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC
Violating 3RR Again
You had better watch your edits, you have violated the 3RR rule again. Spike 20:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Reverting vandalism by cowardly AOL proxy users is not a violation of 3RR. Leuko 20:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Actually, it's really not vandalism. It's more of an edit war and that does fall under 3RR. Regardless, cases that are not clear cut vandalism should be reported and handled by a mod. or admin. for wikipedia, not an average user. Spike 21:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, since their is obviously a dispute over the factual accuracy of the article, I would welcome an admin to lock the article with the current dispute banner in place. Leuko 21:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
