User talk:Lemonsawdust

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Lemonsawdust, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dick Clark 19:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] 2001

On a page I created you added:

To meet Wikipedia's quality standards, this article or section may require cleanup. This article or section seems not to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia entry. Please improve the article or discuss proposed changes on the talk page. See Wikipedia's guide to writing better articles for suggestions.


What are you talking about (query)?

Jason Palpatine 06:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Much of the text in the 2001: A Space Odyssey plot synopsis appears to be perhaps excessively artistic rather than encyclopedic in nature. For example, in the 3rd paragraph from the bottom of the "Jupiter and Beyond the Infinite" "This time, there is no sound as the ebon block appears; the process is swift and certain. If man could be made from the ape, what could be made from man?" If this is cited from a text somewhere, it was not in quotation marks. There are a number examples possible throughout the synopsis, with some of the most overt ones in this final section. It just seems rather more poetic and less objective and factual than one would expect from an encyclopedia entry. Lemonsawdust 06:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

You're brother doesn't wear tight pants....That's not right...--Mikepope 06:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

What? I don't get it. Lemonsawdust 06:41, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry. It's a Kevin Meaney joke.--Mikepope 14:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Greetings!

Thanks for adding your name to Wikipedia:WikiProject Law - we're on our way to making Wikipedia the world's most comprehensive source of legal information. Cheers! BD2412 T 21:51, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SCOTUS

Hey, just wanted to say thanks for doing a great job with Wisconsin v. Mitchell. Don't worry about not adding the SCOTUS infobox - it's much more difficult to write up a case than it is to insert a infobox, so you've already done all the heavy lifting. Hope to see you contributing more to SCOTUS cases in the future! If you have a chance, check out the Project Collaboration Article, which is a weekly drive to improve a specific Supreme Court case, and see if it's something that interests you - we'd love to have you onboard. Cheers, RidG Talk 22:13, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

I was going to say the same thing RidG said. I've been behind in welcoming new people. In any case, I finally added the infobox, so that's done, and with the new template they are much easier. Hope you'll join us at the next PCA. Cheers and happy editing!--Kchase02 T 18:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Good tweaks on the Mitchell page; but isn't it still appropriate to say that "The Court" said something, especially if it's a unanimous decision? Just looking for your thoughts on this. Thanks! Lemonsawdust 05:26, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Good question. Gonzales v. UDV references the author, but then uses "the court", so I think you're correct. I'll change it back. Thanks for bringing it up.--Kchase02 T 05:40, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../l/e/m/User_talk%7ELemonsawdust_454a.html"