User talk:Legis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
When leaving messages on this talkpage, please remember three things:
- If you start a chat, talk, or discussion, or make comments here, I will respond here and not on some other talk page. Similarly, if I post on your talk page, I'd prefer to continue the conversation there. Thus, we can avoid incomprehensible disjointed threads spread over several pages.
- No matter how much I may have p*ssed you off with my edits, please remember (i) assume good faith, (ii) no personal attacks please, and (iii) if two viewpoints are truly irreconcilable on a subject, the article should reflect both. I strive to uphold these standards myself, and if I fail please tell me.
- Every so often I clear out and delete all the messages on my talk page. I do not keep an archive, I simply delete them on the basis that no one will ever care. I make no apologies for this. I am a caveman.
[edit] The Eagles
Please have another look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Eagles (UK band). I'm working on expanding the article, and they definitely pass WP:MUSIC on virtually ever point... I've put a point-by-point summary of exactly how on the article's talk page Talk:The Eagles (UK band). I strongly disagree with a merge to Grainer's article. Although they were his protogee for much of their career, their body of work should be considered seperately: he was a composer of film scores, they were a rock band. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Economist (editorial stance)
I'm the one who edited the Economist editorial stance page to mention the endorsement of the Democratic Party. I included my reasoning on that page and feel it is a necessary edit. The reasons you cite to remove my article can be used to remove at least 10 of the remaining endorsements and so I feel that if mine should not be included, the entire endorsement section should be removed. Tatsumaki4ryu
[edit] Vandal
Thanks for your vandal-fighting efforts! You warned him after his last vandal edit, so if he vandalizes again, I'll block him. It's been a few days since the IP's previous vandal edits, so I'd like to give him one more chance. (Maybe it's not the same vandal.) --Fang Aili talk 17:06, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. Looking at the edits for that IP, it may well be a school. It looks like there are some proper edit from the other vandalism that you reverted. Legis (talk - contributions) 17:07, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure that was a vandal edit, from the way it sounded in the article. But if you think I'm wrong go ahead and fix it. --Fang Aili talk 17:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- No on reflection, I think you are right. Hope editing articles on Caribbean islands whilst in freezing Wisconsin is not too traumatic at this time of year... Legis (talk - contributions) 17:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure that was a vandal edit, from the way it sounded in the article. But if you think I'm wrong go ahead and fix it. --Fang Aili talk 17:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)