User talk:Larryfooter
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome
Hi Larryfooter, I left this message on your user page by mistake a couple of weeks ago. I'm moving it here where it belongs . . .
- You make a number of good points on the Impeach Bush page, but I think you are forgetting that this article does not purport to make valid allegations against Bush. The point of the article is to describe a movement (if you can call it that) to impeach Bush. In order to serve this function, it is necessary to state the reasons impeachment proponents give for wanting to impeach Bush. It is not the place of this article to evaluate, prove, or disprove these allegations, but merely to indentify them as part of a scientific exposition of a particular political phenomenon. I think it's a good idea to add a section called "Response to Allegations." It's definitely an appropriate addition, in my opinion. -asx- 04:31, 13 July 2005 (UTC) (Moved. -asx- 18:24, 24 July 2005 (UTC))
- Hi - and thanks for your message ... i left a reply on your talk page, but i will also leave a copy of it here for you too: i will make a response to allegations section if the page doesnt get deleted - as i mentioned in the discussion page on the topic, i really dont think it warrants its own entry, but rather should be a footnote to the overall page on the president - but that's just my opinion - it seems to have generated all kinds of discussion - and there is a vote going on now - it looks like the page will in fact stay up and not get merged with the bush page - and if it does stay, then i'll write a response section as soon as i can - again, thanks for your message Larryfooter 19:32, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know about the vote. I've thrown my 2 cents in to the ring . . . Take care, -asx- 21:04, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Hi - and thanks for your message ... i left a reply on your talk page, but i will also leave a copy of it here for you too: i will make a response to allegations section if the page doesnt get deleted - as i mentioned in the discussion page on the topic, i really dont think it warrants its own entry, but rather should be a footnote to the overall page on the president - but that's just my opinion - it seems to have generated all kinds of discussion - and there is a vote going on now - it looks like the page will in fact stay up and not get merged with the bush page - and if it does stay, then i'll write a response section as soon as i can - again, thanks for your message Larryfooter 19:32, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
