Lame duck (politics)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A lame duck is an elected official who loses political power or is no longer responsive to the electorate as a result of
- a term limit which keeps him from running for that particular office again,
- losing an election, or
- the elimination of the official's office, but who continues to hold office until the end of the official's term.
Lame duck officials are in the peculiar position of not facing the consequences of their actions in the next election, meaning they are generally considered not accountable for their actions. They also tend to have less political power, as other elected officials see less advantage in cooperating with them. On the other hand, lame duck executives, particularly Presidents of the United States, are notorious for issuing a series of executive orders or making appointments during their last days which they would not otherwise have made if it would have influenced the vote.
Contents |
[edit] Examples
[edit] Australia
In Australia, regardless of when the election is held, the Senate (or upper house) sits from the 1st of July following the election to the 30th of June three years later, while the newly elected members of the House of Representatives (or Lower House, of which the leader of the party (or coalition of parties) with a majority of members forms Government ) take their seats immediately after an election. A Senate which is destined to lose its majority as a result of such a change is called a lame-duck Senate, and often attracts criticism if it blocks Government measures introduced in the House of Representatives.
For example, after the 2004 Election, it became clear that the governing Liberal Party/National Party coalition would gain a majority in the new Senate, which was due to sit the following July. In May, some months after the elections but before the new Senate came to power, the old Senate refused to pass new tax laws that had been passed by the House, which merely served to delay the passage of those laws until the new Senate assembled. This behaviour will usually not attract the same level of criticism if the election has not significantly altered Senate composition.
[edit] United States
Any president of the United States who had been twice elected to the office since the 22nd amendment introduced term limits is, by the above definition, a lame duck for his entire second term, as he is prohibited from seeking re-election. However, presidents are not usually considered to be lame ducks until the election of their successor, unless their party loses control of Congress in the midterms. The current U.S. president George W. Bush was technically a lame duck after winning re-election, but was not considered a lame duck until the Democrats won the midterm elections in 2006.
[edit] Mexico
The President of Mexico is a lame duck for his entire term, as he is prohibited from ever being re-elected. The same is partly true of the Governor of the state of Virginia in the United States, who is limited to one term, but can hold office again if another governor was in office since his last term.
[edit] Origins of the term
The term originated in the 1700s regarding stockbrokers who could not meet their debts. It was transferred to politicians in the 1860s.
A lame duck session is a formal meeting of old members of an organization after an election of new members, but before their new terms have started.
