User talk:LadyofHats

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Illustration problem

There might be a problem with the illustration in Ashley's stopper knot. See the talk page for details. Regards. --Lee Hunter 20:06, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Looks ok now (you might have to refresh your browser cache to see the new image). Thanks! --Lee Hunter 20:27, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)


HI I don't know about the recent problem with the immage, but it looks okay to me.

[edit] Hornwort Diagram

The picture looks very nice. Thank you very much for creating it, since it will add much to the page. I recommend only two small changes:

(1) It would be better to draw the pseudoelater cells so that they do not touch the spores. Some people might be confused, and think that the pseudoelater is a part of the spore (as the elaters are in horsetails). The pseudoelaters develop from separate cells in hornworts, and are not attached to the spores.

(2) Relabel the hornwort as "Phaeoceros, hornwort" instead of "Anthoceros". The picture you have drawn has a smooth surface for the gametophyte and yellow spores, which are characteristic of the genus Phaeoceros. The genus Anthoceros has a rough and wrinkled gametophyte, and produces black spores.

--EncycloPetey

The new diagram looks nice. I have added text to the hornwort page about the life cycle to complement the diagram. -- EncycloPetey 17:55, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Animal Cell Scheme

Your illustrations for the plant cell are great, could you make an animal cell too? Chb--193.171.244.103 22:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Here are some Images. Ive done a quick google search for the best. I hope you can work with them, thanks. --81.28.129.97 08:43, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the illustration, it looks great :-). I have removed the descriptions and uploaded it to commons. Image:Anima cell notext.svg

Below are the german expressions:

Nukleus Kern
Nuclear pore Kernpore
Nuclear envelope Kernhülle
Chromatin
Nucleolus Nukleolus
Ribosomes Ribosomen
Plasma Membrane Plasmamembran
Mitochondrion Mitochondrien
Peroxisome Peroxysomen
Cytoskeleton Cytoskelett
Free Ribosomes freie Ribosomen
Flagellum Flagelle
Smooth endoplasmatic Reticulum raues endoplasmatisches Retikulum
rough endoplasmatic Reticulum glattes endoplasmatisches Retikulum
Secretory vesicle Sekretionsvesikel (but Vesikel could also be used)
Cytoplasm Cytoplasma
Centrioles Centriolen
Lysosome Lysosomen
Golgi vesicles Golgi Vesikel
Golgi Aparatus Golgi-Apparat

Alternatively you could just give me the Font and I'll add them myself :). As for other Projects if you don't mind I will get back to you if there is something. --81.28.129.97 16:36, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

I just wanted to thank you for your beautiful diagram at Overriding aorta. --Arcadian 13:54, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Prenoceratops pieganensis

hi, i am working on a posible ilustration on the page Prenoceratops. yet i am having some problems with my sources so i thought you could help me. you see here and here it apears with shorter front legs. but here and here it apears with long thin legs. i took the second one becouse it is a picture of the bones, and yet i am not sure becouse the foto is so small.

Another thing i do not get is how many fingers it has. since in none of the sources apears clearly enough.

here is what i have done so far. it would be great to have your opinion.LadyofHats 12:02, 26 June 2006 (UTC).

Hi LadyofHats,
Thanks for contacting me. I really appreciate it. You may or may not know that Wikipedia:WikiProject Dinosaurs is in desperate need for accurate dinosaur illustrations. We've got more than 1,000 articles, most of which do not have even one illustration. We are slowly rectifying that, but your note is most welcome.
A few notes: When placing external links, please make sure to not put the | in the link; it causes the link to be invalid. I've fixed it in the above links, but was originally puzzled when the links you gave me didn't work. A great place to discuss your image is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Dinosaurs/Image review, where there are several of us who can help with reviewing the image. I'm in a rush this morning, and can't give you a proper critique or tips, until later today, so the only thing I'll mention is that Prenoceratops is described as an animal with a "small and light body...very agile", while your illustration seems to show a more portly fellow. Thanks again for the contact, and I'll get back to you this afternoon. Happy editing! :)--Firsfron of Ronchester 15:29, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Wow - great that you're trying to draw some of these things. I go permission to upload someone's Leptoceratops if that's any help Cas Liber 17:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC) Yes they are closely related. I couldn't tell you how the animals differed yet though. Cas Liber 19:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

I guess the main difference will be in the skull - apparently Prenoceratops has a more sloping head Cas Liber 19:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

I originally posted this on the image review page, but I'll post it here, too, since I'm not sure if the Image review page is on your watchlist. First, thanks for working with us, LadyofHats. It's obvious you're an artist of great ability.

After a careful examination of the body, it does look pretty similar to the third link you provided. However, there should be no grass. Grass evolved during the Cenozoic [1], after this beastie became extinct. I'm also worried that the eye is overly large, but will research this.--Firsfron of Ronchester 21:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
As I suspected, the eye on your latest drawing is a bit too large, giving the animal a "cute factor". Also, according to this site, Psittacosaurus, not too distantly related, had four functional toes on the back legs, and three main "fingers" with two reduced side digits on the front legs. Hope this helps! Thanks for working on this image; we still are in need of many images. :) --Firsfron of Ronchester 21:26, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Also, do check back at the image review page, if you get a chance, because more comments have been added.--Firsfron of Ronchester 02:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

nice pic! The other thing to note with ceratopsians is the recent discovery of a longer keratinous horny material on the jugal horn (lateral thingy behind the eye) on a recent well preserved Psittacosaurus, so it may have been longer in real life. What are you thinking of drawing next? Shall we send requests? :) Cas Liber 21:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] dinosaurs

I do think it's great you're doing dinos - if anything I would recommned doing ones that are known from more or less complete skeletons first as there is enough to work with there, rather than those known from just a few bones. We can let you know which ones are known vs hypothesised. But it is up to you, everyone doing dinoproject would be grateful for any input :) Cas Liber 05:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

...You'd be surprised. One would expect that well-known dinosaurs are awalys known from lots of fossils and poorly known ones from little material but that isn't always true: Monoclonius is well known and was often depicted in old books but is known from very meagre material. Unusual ones (i.e those which may not have a pic yet) which actually have a good fossil record include Shunosaurus (interesting one this, a sauropod with a tail club), Gastonia, Minmi, Yinlong to name a few. (thus, skeletal reconstructions of these are based upon actual bones rather than hypothetical ones eg. most sauropod genera have not had skulls ever found, so they are conjecture..) cheers :) Cas Liber 11:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Very nice Edmontonia, another full skeleton is Ceratosaurus. Like Allosaurus but had a crocodile-like tail and long body possibly for swimming. Cas Liber 10:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar for your really cool illustrations to WP:Dinos, as well as aortas and plant cells! :) Cas Liber 11:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar for your really cool illustrations to WP:Dinos, as well as aortas and plant cells! :) Cas Liber 11:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions; they add colour to Wikipedia

Hey, another one known from a near-complete skeleton is Amargasaurus from South America, which has these coll funky mysterious spines on its back....Cas Liber 11:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
i am a bit busy with a project in 2 weeks i can work on wikipedia again -LadyofHats 07:25, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
That's cool. Just an idea. All the drawings have been greatCas Liber 20:27, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for your message

The title says it! :-) - Ballista 08:46, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Featured Picture
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Ant worker morphology corrected.svg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.

Congratulations, and thanks for making it for us. Raven4x4x 08:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dinosaur images

Hi Lady, I just wanted to take a moment and thank you for your many wonderful dinosaur images that now grace our pages. We're really lucky to have you, and I hope you never leave! :) I think my favorite illustration so far is the one you made for Achelousaurus, but they're all really great. You've shown a lot of patience; it can't be easy to try to illustrate some of these animals, with so much conflicting information. So I'd like to award you this:

The Zen Garden Award The Zen Garden Award for Infinite Patience For your extraordinary patience and dedication in creating so many images for WP Dinosaurs. There is so much bad or conflicting information, yet you do a great job every time. Thank you. --Firsfron of Ronchester 23:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] congrats

Hi there, I just wanted to congradulate you on your Graphic Designer's Barnstar and your awesome images. Your skill is amazing, and really helped me understand more about plant cells. Thanks for the cool contributions. Will G. 22:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I Used one of your Images!

Hello, I have recently designed a new diagram for the article on nuclear pore. I have used your nucleus diagram as the basis of my work. I have attributed everything that was yours to you, but I'd love it if you give it a look, and hopefully, you can give it your blessing! Thanks! Adenosine | Talk 06:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for Centrosaurus

Thanks for your lovely work on Centrosaurus, Lady! :) Firsfron of Ronchester 16:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] POTD notification

This is to let you know the Featured Picture you uploaded and/or nominated Image:Plant cell structure svg.svg is scheduled to be Picture of the day on December 18, 2006, when it will be featured on the Main Page. Congratulations! howcheng {chat} 17:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../l/a/d/User_talk%7ELadyofHats_2950.html"