Talk:La Venta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, its civilizations, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritising and managing its workload.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the Project's importance scale.


[edit] Expansion potential

This article is coming along very nicely. Per Madman's request, there are a couple of areas for expansion/mentioning that I can think of at the moment, which would be useful to cover when considering putting forward for review/promotion:

  1. some detailing of the archaeological/ceramic phases and chronologies which have been defined for the site. Some more context on the site's antiquity in relation to other Mesoamerican areas and overall mesoamerican chronology.
  2. some more exposition on the site's relationships with other Gulf Coast sites and complexes (both geographically and chronologically), and the relative timings of these sites' activities (eg where the peak development at La Venta fits in with earlier, contemporary and later Gulf Coast floresences, maybe also comparison of models of competitive settlements controlling certain resources vs state-like entities, etc).
  3. in particular, some survey of the innovations found at La Venta (mid-Formative), not identified in previous complexes
  4. some mention of La Venta's association with the early development of stela erection in Mesoamerica
  5. some coverage of burials and goods, cached celt & jadeite finds
  6. some mention of the aqueduct/drainage system, and and interpreted associations of water regards to rituals
  7. The site map is great, but I think the location map can be substantively improved upon (too dark for my liking, a custom-made one would be best)

The references might need some expanding, too. The above just an outline of suggestions for any further expansions, probably some of which could be optional for the purposes of getting the article through, say, a GA nomination.--cjllw | TALK 08:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)