Talk:Kybalion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is worked on by WikiProject Occult in order to expand, improve, and standardize articles related to the occult. Feel free to edit the article attached to this talk page and/or become a participating member.

"The content of this book is generally believed to be a portion of the teachings of Hermes Trismegistus and outlines seven principles on which it is based." This is a more or less completely unfounded statement in a couple of respects. Who exactly believes it to be part of Hermes Trismegistus' teachings? How many people? For that matter, it makes it sound like there is a coherent body of teachings attributed to Hermes Trismegistus, and this is really not the case. And lastly, looking through some of the actual, very old texts attributed to the guy, I doubt you'll find these "seven principles". This is a bad way to open up the article, and it needs to be replaced with some factual information, at minimum framing these statements as part of the book's claims. --67.185.40.164 04:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm looking forward to editing this page heavily. To answer some of these old questions.... The book is dedicated to Hermes, and in only this respect is it included into Hermeticism, as far as I can tell. Its a newer (if you were living in 1912) take on the older texts. I'm not sure how many people concider this Hermeticism, since that would be a subjective answer. A NPOV will be thrown onto the page, so anything making it sound like there was a "coherent body of teachings" will be noted. And I'm sure a few of these principles are spread out through the many texts "attributed" to Hermes. :)

Zos 06:51, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm actually getting ready to take out the part about Hermans Magical Universe.... Since I've read the Kybalion, I have seen no relationship to a book about a 7 year old finding the meaning of life. Either someone should come along and explain this relationship, or cite how it is related, and how it was "derived" from the Kybalion please.

Zos 06:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

I have now added more content to the page, and edited it. What I have taken off of the page will possibly be used to make a page for the authors Three Initiates. There are very few if no references to site for this book, since the book cites only itself (if read you will understand). And since the authors are officialy still unknown, there is little that should be acknowledged on this page, besides what the book says about itself! Please add more sources, if any are found to validate this book outside of specualtion.

Zos 08:32, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Derivative Works

I'd like to know how Herman’s Magical Universe is a derivative work. I'm taking it off because based on the description (here, and on Amazon.com), it doesnt classify as a derivative work. Zos 10:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

The Summum organization did not acknowledge being a derivative work until 2003 - Previously, when the 2 books were identical, they claimed the book was given to Ra by extraterrestrials in a genetic download. Summum published the "Kybalion Resource Page" -which is a marketing tool for the Summum church- and reworked their literature and website to reflect this new public stand of derivative status. Herman's Magical Universe, in fact, gives a weak reference to The Kybalion in the supporting literature of the book- inside the book- not to the extent that Summum is doing as a derivative work, but as the Children version of the book. Perhaps the author will, too, be forced to acknowledge the origins, or at least have the Kybalion influence more clearly defined. I hope you consider these, but if you must leave out the reference to Herman's Magical Universe, then leave also out the one to the Summum material. Leave the Kybalion page to be just for the Kybalion. Or add a page that addresses the intellectual property issue, since Summum copyrighted the book they did not write. You can find many people who are familiar with the Kybalion among secret societies who mandate its reading like the Rosicrusian, Masons, and others out there that would offer their help. Thanks.

[edit] Publishing date

My copy says it was published in 1912. Why does this say 1908? I see someone just re-categorized it based on 1908...Zos 00:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)