User talk:Ktims
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Request Map
Hi,
I see you've added an SVG image of the Khanda. I was wondering if you're interested in doing the same for a map, based on a non-SVG map?
Thanks and welcome (back?) to Wikipedia! Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 20:06, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- I'd be willing to give it a shot, but I'm really not a vector graphics artist or GIS person, the Khanda is simple geometrically, so doing a Trace Bitmap worked out pretty well, and I could just tweak some of the corners a bit. I'm not sure the same would be true of a map, but I can give it a try. Which map were you wanting done?
- If you could try that'd be excellent!
- Basically I require a map like [1] (see "Punjab in 1966:"). This shows the Punjab area of India and Pakistan when it was unified in British India. It then shows the current divisions in the respective countries.
- Once this outline is done, I would like to use several derived maps by colouring in particular states and divisions. If you could do this, it would be a huge help! Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 23:33, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not totally clear on the difference between the 1966 and current maps. The divisions of Punjab seem to be identical.
[edit] Thanks
The map looks great! Thanks! Is it possible to make derived maps with certain states coloured in? Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 20:53, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- It should be pretty easy, let me know what you want or make a mockup or something :) --Ktims 06:48, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, ace! By the way, I've noticed a slight problem with the Pakistan map. Islamabad is like a union territory so can that be in its own dotted circle like Delhi/Chandigarh?
- These are the maps that would be good:
- Greater Punjab area - Make Pakistan Punjab, HP, Haryana, Indian Punjab and Chandigarh the same colour. Maybe having a similar but lighter colour for Delhi.
- Indian Punjab area - Same as above, except don't include Pakistani Punjab.
- I've also got an idea for a linguistic map, but we can have a look at that later! Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 18:38, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] New Black Tusk Pics
I like the new Black Tusk pics a lot, and I like the new gallery section. --R
[edit] Transparency
The background was copied from the Commons where it has been very successful. For the cases where it does cause a problem, it is much easier to click on the image to see it on a white background, that in it is to load it up in an image editor to see the transparency, were we not to have it. If you like, take it up on the talk page, but I get the feeling that more people like it than dislike it, and so it should be enabled by default. ed g2s • talk 14:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- Quite, although diagrams in SVG should be suitable filled in - so the background shows us where these files need to be fixed... ed g2s • talk 14:37, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Manchester_test.svg
Thanks for uploading Image:Manchester_test.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Mp3_rules_2005-03-03.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Mp3_rules_2005-03-03.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Sinh_cosh_tanh.svg
Hi I think is is very nice.I have dovnload gnuplot but I can not make anything (I sorry) can you made Sin_asin.svg and another trigionometrik funktion.Thanks!--Jaro.p 08:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Taylorsine.svg
- (originally this meessage was written to Jaro.p as I thought it was him who made the picture)
Hi. Thank you for the picture Image:Taylorsine.svg you created. One request. Would you mind making the curves in the picture thicker, so that the picture does not appear so blurry? Same for the axes, and a bit larger fonts won't hurt either. Sorry to bug you, your work is appreciated, but if we can make it look nicer it will be even better. Thanks, you can reply here if you have comments. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- Same about Image:Sin asin.svg. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:SVG render test.svg
Thanks for uploading Image:SVG render test.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Brown noise spectrum.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Brown noise spectrum.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.
Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 06:24, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] wikEd
Hi, I have seen that you are using the Cacycle editor extension. This program is no longer actively maintained in favor of its much more powerful successor wikEd.
wikEd has all the functionality of the old editor plus:• syntax highlighting • nifty image buttons • morefixing buttons • paste formatted text from Word or web pages• convert the formatted text into wikicode • adjustthe font size • and much, much more.
Switching to wikEd is easy, check the detailed installation description on its project homepage. Usually it is as simple as changing every occurrence of editor.js into wikEd.js on your User:YourUsername/monobook.js page.
Cacycle 21:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
